Yeah no shit, that's the point. The jury just used the glove as an excuse to rationalize letting him off, even though it clearly did fit, just like you guys are doing here.
"If the pixels are blurry, must hung jury".
What's more comical is even if this were true and not just a low res camera still you're helping to convict your boy because then the prosecution won't present that evidence to the jury. /golfclap
Even more compelling evidence Tyler isn't guilty
Go on, give me your conspiracy theory on why the prosecution is lying about two cars being the same. Or they're completely incompetent, right?
Btw in this country we have a presumption of innocence, so no defendant has to prove they're not guilty. The burden of proof is on the prosecution.
i don't presume communist tranny fuckers are innocent of anything
After you tell me why the prosecution lied about the glove.
They didn't.
Now your turn.
Yeah no shit, that's the point. The jury just used the glove as an excuse to rationalize letting him off, even though it clearly did fit, just like you guys are doing here.
"If the pixels are blurry, must hung jury".
What's more comical is even if this were true and not just a low res camera still you're helping to convict your boy because then the prosecution won't present that evidence to the jury. /golfclap
I haven't been follow the case at all, busy with other shit, but is the defense arguing that's not Tyler's car?