Yeah no shit, that's the point. The jury just used the glove as an excuse to rationalize letting him off, even though it clearly did fit, just like you guys are doing here.
"If the pixels are blurry, must hung jury".
What's more comical is even if this were true and not just a low res camera still you're helping to convict your boy because then the prosecution won't present that evidence to the jury. /golfclap
The car is how they "authenticated" Tyler being on campus in the first place. Since this isn't his car, even that fig leaf of evidence is shredded.
What's more comical is even if this were true and not just a low res camera
It's true. There's at least 3 clearly different features on the car and a Dodge tech identified it as the V8 trim. Sorry bud, you might as well try to say red is actually green.
That can be rigged but yes, that is possibly a trick of the light.
Unless they can explain the differences, they shouldn't, without the plate number or an uncommon bumpersticker or damage it is weaksauce evidence anyway and is at best a waste of the jurors time.
No I'm saying you'll look at some low res image somebody screen-capped from a youtube stream of an oblique view of a court monitor showing interlaced video from a convex camera and say "aha it's not him look at the pixels!".
Just like the gloves, any little imaginary discrepancy to hang your hat on. Anything that validates your crazy.
You can see at 3:36 there's nothing weird on the front of this car. It doesn't look at all like the OP screenshot. Turning into the row at 3:53 there's nothing on the front.
Leaving at 6:03 you can see the 'lower lip' in some frames so it's not totally faked, but somebody carefully picked out a frame with probably compression or interlacing artifacts and made you look like a fool.
After you tell me why the prosecution lied about the glove.
They didn't.
Now your turn.
Yeah no shit, that's the point. The jury just used the glove as an excuse to rationalize letting him off, even though it clearly did fit, just like you guys are doing here.
"If the pixels are blurry, must hung jury".
What's more comical is even if this were true and not just a low res camera still you're helping to convict your boy because then the prosecution won't present that evidence to the jury. /golfclap
The car is how they "authenticated" Tyler being on campus in the first place. Since this isn't his car, even that fig leaf of evidence is shredded.
It's true. There's at least 3 clearly different features on the car and a Dodge tech identified it as the V8 trim. Sorry bud, you might as well try to say red is actually green.
Unless they can explain the differences, they shouldn't, without the plate number or an uncommon bumpersticker or damage it is weaksauce evidence anyway and is at best a waste of the jurors time.
So you are saying Tyler changed the bodywork of his car and replaced the exhaust after he killed Charlie and was on the run?
Mhm... yes. It's just like the gloves.
No I'm saying you'll look at some low res image somebody screen-capped from a youtube stream of an oblique view of a court monitor showing interlaced video from a convex camera and say "aha it's not him look at the pixels!".
Just like the gloves, any little imaginary discrepancy to hang your hat on. Anything that validates your crazy.
You can see at 3:36 there's nothing weird on the front of this car. It doesn't look at all like the OP screenshot. Turning into the row at 3:53 there's nothing on the front.
Leaving at 6:03 you can see the 'lower lip' in some frames so it's not totally faked, but somebody carefully picked out a frame with probably compression or interlacing artifacts and made you look like a fool.