Genuinely curious, what makes her nominally on our side?
I don't have Twatter so she just seems like yet another foolish wench in my eyes. But maybe you have a different perspective that might make her seem less foolish.
Or she copied her beliefs from her man, which is just as tenuous. The moment the relationship goes sour, the so-called "based woman" will disavow everything in order to get back in the herd. Bonus points if the foid uses the "grooming" word.
Repeal the 19th.
Sarah Fields is nominally on our side, but she is a woman, and she is demonstrating here why women should not be able to vote.
Genuinely curious, what makes her nominally on our side?
I don't have Twatter so she just seems like yet another foolish wench in my eyes. But maybe you have a different perspective that might make her seem less foolish.
Usually conservative female influencers are just grifters. Though the conservative and female qualifiers of that statement are probably unnecessary.
Or she copied her beliefs from her man, which is just as tenuous. The moment the relationship goes sour, the so-called "based woman" will disavow everything in order to get back in the herd. Bonus points if the foid uses the "grooming" word.
She is a MAGA conservative, but not race realist, and has been covering the Karmello Antony trial in depth .