I don't get it. Do you guys say this sort of thing just to be edgy, or what? You can't possibly think your movement has a future while vilifying the vast majority of the human population.
You think this is being "edgy" or a joke, but the others are correct, the Milgrim Experiment proves what is a very well known biological reality that women need social support to survive, as it's an inherent part of how they maintain cohesion to birth and raise children (previously, in societies without the amenities developed countries support today):
Even still, while the average lass can live without constant social support thanks to electricity, automobiles/public transport and the internet, they still subconsciously hold onto the intrinsic idea that they must conform to social standards to avoid being ostracised.
The study from 2014 is especially important because it highlights an empirical trend we're seeing now -- that the majority of women are socially captured by social media, and that social media makes majority of women feel inferior and self-conscious and inadequate:
When you look at this in a microcosm it doesn't seem like such a radical thing; something maybe the average lass can overcome with therapy or whatnot. But when viewed as a macrocosm, we realise that they grow up to VOTE or become candidates that get VOTED FOR, and they take all of their biologically embedded subconcious behaviours with them into office.
Ergo, a woman led by her emotions and the wililngness to be socially accepted by her peers and those she feels are above her (i.e,. The Elites) will always succumb to whatever pressures they mount on her, so as not to become a victim of the thing she fears most: being outcast.
That 'femoid' was the anti-immigration candidate.
Yeah, but it's a woman...
Women have no principles.
That so?
Yes.
I don't get it. Do you guys say this sort of thing just to be edgy, or what? You can't possibly think your movement has a future while vilifying the vast majority of the human population.
You think this is being "edgy" or a joke, but the others are correct, the Milgrim Experiment proves what is a very well known biological reality that women need social support to survive, as it's an inherent part of how they maintain cohesion to birth and raise children (previously, in societies without the amenities developed countries support today):
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/milgrams-infamous-shock-studies-still-hold-lessons-for-confronting/
Even still, while the average lass can live without constant social support thanks to electricity, automobiles/public transport and the internet, they still subconsciously hold onto the intrinsic idea that they must conform to social standards to avoid being ostracised.
The study from 2014 is especially important because it highlights an empirical trend we're seeing now -- that the majority of women are socially captured by social media, and that social media makes majority of women feel inferior and self-conscious and inadequate:
When you look at this in a microcosm it doesn't seem like such a radical thing; something maybe the average lass can overcome with therapy or whatnot. But when viewed as a macrocosm, we realise that they grow up to VOTE or become candidates that get VOTED FOR, and they take all of their biologically embedded subconcious behaviours with them into office.
Ergo, a woman led by her emotions and the wililngness to be socially accepted by her peers and those she feels are above her (i.e,. The Elites) will always succumb to whatever pressures they mount on her, so as not to become a victim of the thing she fears most: being outcast.
Did you change your argument completely to "women are unprincipled" to "women need social support for their children"?
I guess you haven't checked in on her recently. She's gone the complete opposite direction on immigration since
same thing with italy's trojan horse