No I made an informed legal take based on the reporting from all sources at the time. You just made a reddit tier take like a retard. The law doesn't care about your feelings
It's not an informed legal take to suggest that being insulted justifies attempted murder AND also nullifies self defense against said attempted murder. Especially when the supposed insult was entirely imagined by you.
That's a "blacks get to do whatever they want" take.
Agreed. Good on Matt for adjusting his stance based on new info but "assault is justified because it was a nigger chimping out over hurty words" is clearly a reddit-tier argument.
Pretty obvious someone graduated a DEI-infested university.
Takes about thirty seconds to look up the definition of provocation and guess what? You're still wrong.
There is absolutely nothing in the initial reports to suggest mutual combat, neither one fucked the other guy's wife, and neither one welched on a bet, etc, etc.
Being insulted does not justify attempted murder and it doesn't not nullify the self defense claims of the person you attacked. That is the law.
Uh, yeah. It does. That's why niggers who commit crimes get off scot free if there are enough niggers on the jury. The law takes a back seat to mob rule; that has been clearly demonstrated many times over.
There isn't a "would have been". You decided to make a reddit tier take on what was frankly a fairly obvious situation.
No I made an informed legal take based on the reporting from all sources at the time. You just made a reddit tier take like a retard. The law doesn't care about your feelings
It's not an informed legal take to suggest that being insulted justifies attempted murder AND also nullifies self defense against said attempted murder. Especially when the supposed insult was entirely imagined by you.
That's a "blacks get to do whatever they want" take.
Agreed. Good on Matt for adjusting his stance based on new info but "assault is justified because it was a nigger chimping out over hurty words" is clearly a reddit-tier argument.
Pretty obvious someone graduated a DEI-infested university.
Find me a single comment where I said the assault was justified even under provocation you gutless faggot
That is literally not even close to what I said. Another retard
Nope. Provocation will almost always nullify self defense claims. This is established law.
Find me one comment I made where I said that Fox was justified.
Also I did not make any imagined claim faggot. I based my analysis of the incident on the information that had been reported.
Again you retarded faggot I never claimed Fox was justified just that Chud couldn't claim self defense. Those are entirely different things.
Yup.
Takes about thirty seconds to look up the definition of provocation and guess what? You're still wrong.
There is absolutely nothing in the initial reports to suggest mutual combat, neither one fucked the other guy's wife, and neither one welched on a bet, etc, etc.
Being insulted does not justify attempted murder and it doesn't not nullify the self defense claims of the person you attacked. That is the law.
Uh, yeah. It does. That's why niggers who commit crimes get off scot free if there are enough niggers on the jury. The law takes a back seat to mob rule; that has been clearly demonstrated many times over.
I'm sorry you dedicated your life to a lie...
I don't live in liberal fairy faggot country. If I did my job would be alot easier
Really? Where is this Shangrila, this Garden of Eden, untouched by nons?