The guy that Chud shot
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
It's not an informed legal take to suggest that being insulted justifies attempted murder AND also nullifies self defense against said attempted murder. Especially when the supposed insult was entirely imagined by you.
That's a "blacks get to do whatever they want" take.
Agreed. Good on Matt for adjusting his stance based on new info but "assault is justified because it was a nigger chimping out over hurty words" is clearly a reddit-tier argument.
Pretty obvious someone graduated a DEI-infested university.
Find me a single comment where I said the assault was justified even under provocation you gutless faggot
Woah there, watch out, you're "provoking" me. I might have no choice but to respond with physical violence...
I tell you what, go fill out a Butthurt report and give it to HR and I'll wait for them to come talk to me about how mean I'm being :(
Well homo I would just beat the dogshit out of you if you attacked me. The difference is I wouldn't escalate force and get myself in trouble for using lethal force. Also you started the shit talking so you just defeated your own point. Still no quote of me saying that Fox was justified in attacking Chud though
That is literally not even close to what I said. Another retard
If that is true, then the attack itself is de facto justified by the provocation (ie hurty words). Otherwise it would be treated as it should be; an (physically) unprovoked escalation which certainly justifies a response in kind.
Nope. That's not how that works. Both could and would be charged. One would just have more serious charges than the other. It would then be up to a jury to decide. In alot of these cases the initial attacker doesn't even survive to face charges or the DA chooses to not pursue them. Fox would have still been committing assault regardless of provocation
Nope. Provocation will almost always nullify self defense claims. This is established law.
Find me one comment I made where I said that Fox was justified.
Also I did not make any imagined claim faggot. I based my analysis of the incident on the information that had been reported.
Again you retarded faggot I never claimed Fox was justified just that Chud couldn't claim self defense. Those are entirely different things.
Yup.
Takes about thirty seconds to look up the definition of provocation and guess what? You're still wrong.
There is absolutely nothing in the initial reports to suggest mutual combat, neither one fucked the other guy's wife, and neither one welched on a bet, etc, etc.
Being insulted does not justify attempted murder and it doesn't not nullify the self defense claims of the person you attacked. That is the law.