"did anybody in those agencies say to the President, this is a major threat, the nuclear program in Iran"
As per Clinton, it depends on what the definition of "is" is.
The actual thing we want to know is were the Iranians continuing with their nuclear program, would it be a major threat in the future, and when would that be?
Tucker knows the questions to ask, Kiriakou knows we want to know what Iran was doing and when they would accomplish it. But they're not asking and answering those questions.
The reason is totally obvious: Iran was continuing the program and they would get a nuke but in well more than "2 weeks", putting it into the gray area of do we solve the problem now when it's minor or inevitably later when it's major. But then Iran war is a judgement call that you disagree with, not an atrocity by a madman.
It's even more obvious when the news says "but Iran wasn't an imminent nuclear threat", implicitly acknowledging that they would be a future one.
Oh, so the guy who is deadset on being anti-Israel finds a guest who says the things he'd want to hear and promote? That's crazy. Tucker had no idea who he was booking, it was pure coincidence that such a bombshell dropped.
Crazy how that works. Stephen Colbert wants to promote that vaccines are safe and effective and out of sheer luck, the people he interviews will give inside knowledge about how safe and effective pfizer is.
Kiriakou is definitely suspicious at best. While he may tell some truths, like I believe this, I don’t believe his loyalty is to the US first. And don’t get me started onbustamante. That guy’s is a total piece of anti-American garbage.
Be cautious listening to Kiriakou. He is a hardcore leftist. In this case I agree with him, but I find him unreliable.
(Ex) Wife, Heather, was in charge of the Iran leadership team. Makes you think.
Also, no such thing as ex-cia
I like him but at the end of the day he is a spook that calls 9/11 truthers crazy
He's very much of the belief that the CIA was a Pro-US, apolitical force for good until very recently, when Obama openly politicized it.
Iran getting nukes is not a threat to the USA. It's only a threat to Israeli expansion.
As per Clinton, it depends on what the definition of "is" is.
The actual thing we want to know is were the Iranians continuing with their nuclear program, would it be a major threat in the future, and when would that be?
Tucker knows the questions to ask, Kiriakou knows we want to know what Iran was doing and when they would accomplish it. But they're not asking and answering those questions.
The reason is totally obvious: Iran was continuing the program and they would get a nuke but in well more than "2 weeks", putting it into the gray area of do we solve the problem now when it's minor or inevitably later when it's major. But then Iran war is a judgement call that you disagree with, not an atrocity by a madman.
It's even more obvious when the news says "but Iran wasn't an imminent nuclear threat", implicitly acknowledging that they would be a future one.
Oh, so the guy who is deadset on being anti-Israel finds a guest who says the things he'd want to hear and promote? That's crazy. Tucker had no idea who he was booking, it was pure coincidence that such a bombshell dropped.
Crazy how that works. Stephen Colbert wants to promote that vaccines are safe and effective and out of sheer luck, the people he interviews will give inside knowledge about how safe and effective pfizer is.
Wow, what a coincidence.
Kiriakou is definitely suspicious at best. While he may tell some truths, like I believe this, I don’t believe his loyalty is to the US first. And don’t get me started onbustamante. That guy’s is a total piece of anti-American garbage.