I can't watch the video right now but the title is dead on. The woke pecking order is female social hierarchy imposed on society writ large. Getting a handle on the woman question is a prerequisite to slaying this demon.
Arent tint hats a matriarchial society? So im guessing female tiny hats didnt like living in euro centric society where its patriarchial. Thus.. why so many commies and feminists are tiny hats.
Which is kinda funny when they claim to be the same people who the Old Testament recorded as being super patriarchal, to the point that OT women were typically recorded as "X's wife" or "Y's daughter".
We don't have a lot in common genetically with Israelites*, and we made up most of our religion later, but it's anti Semitic to say we aren't them. - Ashenazi probably
*Yes, I know you can identify jews by gene clusters, but it seems like Palestinians would be more directly descended
Essentially, because they worship the hermaphroditic idol abomination (Baphomet) it's why their men are whiny, unmasculine degenerates and why their women are loud, rude, pushy and unfeminine. Have to find that greentext about why jews are essentially female brained (overly emotional, everything's about me but nothing's ever my fault, lying and twisting words is "cleverness" etc.)
I had a though concerning what the exact nature of the problem of female behaviour.
Women always interact at a personal level. I've had the misfortune to have to deal with several female "professionals" across many fields (private and public) over the last decade and every single one of them behaves this way; the quality of their work is directly dependent on whether they like you. I have seen these women intentionally fail to do their jobs, to the point of falsifying records or even breaking the law, causing them to damage their own career or even lose court cases, out of personal spite for me (I'm just that notable, I guess).
Contrast this with men. I've never had a man deal with me that pettily. I have worked for men who completely disagree with me politically, don't take to me personally, or have actually physically fought me and we were able to put those issues asside for the sake of professionalism in every case. At absolute worst, a man might wait and take advantage of a professional opportunity (layoffs, position transfer, etc) to move me away from them but only if they could justify it as being just business (and even in those cases, we were easily able to bury the harchet when we encountered each other later on).
Tl;dr: Men can put aside their personal feelings to acheive higher goals, like professionalism and just success generally. Women take every interaction personally. That's why they shouldn't ever be allowed in management or politics, and why the woman should be removed in every workplace conflict.
Adherence to right wing philosophy is highly testosterone linked too. Remember the study where dem men were given T replacement and suddenly started turning more based?
Society being more womanly created the problem, and men being less cucked and more themselves is the direct solution.
Until the Sean Connery position on how to properly manage hectoring women becomes the mainstream default again there is still more work to be done.
I can't watch the video right now but the title is dead on. The woke pecking order is female social hierarchy imposed on society writ large. Getting a handle on the woman question is a prerequisite to slaying this demon.
Arent tint hats a matriarchial society? So im guessing female tiny hats didnt like living in euro centric society where its patriarchial. Thus.. why so many commies and feminists are tiny hats.
Which is kinda funny when they claim to be the same people who the Old Testament recorded as being super patriarchal, to the point that OT women were typically recorded as "X's wife" or "Y's daughter".
We don't have a lot in common genetically with Israelites*, and we made up most of our religion later, but it's anti Semitic to say we aren't them. - Ashenazi probably
*Yes, I know you can identify jews by gene clusters, but it seems like Palestinians would be more directly descended
If they ever had the covenant (they didn't) it was lost with the killing of Christ.
Essentially, because they worship the hermaphroditic idol abomination (Baphomet) it's why their men are whiny, unmasculine degenerates and why their women are loud, rude, pushy and unfeminine. Have to find that greentext about why jews are essentially female brained (overly emotional, everything's about me but nothing's ever my fault, lying and twisting words is "cleverness" etc.)
I had a though concerning what the exact nature of the problem of female behaviour.
Women always interact at a personal level. I've had the misfortune to have to deal with several female "professionals" across many fields (private and public) over the last decade and every single one of them behaves this way; the quality of their work is directly dependent on whether they like you. I have seen these women intentionally fail to do their jobs, to the point of falsifying records or even breaking the law, causing them to damage their own career or even lose court cases, out of personal spite for me (I'm just that notable, I guess).
Contrast this with men. I've never had a man deal with me that pettily. I have worked for men who completely disagree with me politically, don't take to me personally, or have actually physically fought me and we were able to put those issues asside for the sake of professionalism in every case. At absolute worst, a man might wait and take advantage of a professional opportunity (layoffs, position transfer, etc) to move me away from them but only if they could justify it as being just business (and even in those cases, we were easily able to bury the harchet when we encountered each other later on).
Tl;dr: Men can put aside their personal feelings to acheive higher goals, like professionalism and just success generally. Women take every interaction personally. That's why they shouldn't ever be allowed in management or politics, and why the woman should be removed in every workplace conflict.
The very concept of Izzat is applying female behavior as a social norm.
Adherence to right wing philosophy is highly testosterone linked too. Remember the study where dem men were given T replacement and suddenly started turning more based?
Society being more womanly created the problem, and men being less cucked and more themselves is the direct solution.
Until the Sean Connery position on how to properly manage hectoring women becomes the mainstream default again there is still more work to be done.