Last I checked Jesus acted against nature too. IVF doesn’t make parents less parents, unless this kid is being used for surrogacy it’s a non issue to want healthier children. Go forth and multiply.
I don't know what you mean by he acted against nature. Walked on water? Healed the sick? Don't you see those things are completely different than breeding humans with apes, normalizing human genome editing or ensuring that all future generations of humans would be selected and grown in labs by killing several other developing babies for each one that is born?
Don't you see those things are completely different than breeding humans with apes
Can you show me anywhere this is happening? I’ll wait.
normalizing human genome editing or ensuring that all future generations of humans would be selected and grown in labs by killing several other developing babies for each one that is born.
Again that’s not IVF. You’re making up imaginary scenarios. Embryo selection isn’t abortion, there is no zygote.
Can you show me anywhere this is happening? I’ll wait.
As just a basic search will tell you, it was already attempted in communist countries last century. Because only deranged lunatics with no ethics would want to do this kind of thing. As humanity gets more deranged by the year I'm sure if human genome editing becomes normal then it will be attempted in the future with better technology that might actually succeed.
Embryo selection isn’t abortion, there is no zygote.
An embryo develops from a zygote. In the video they talk about selecting an embryo from a catalog and the rest get destroyed. That's always how IVF has been: make a bunch of babies and destroying all but one that gets used and any others that get frozen for later use or destruction. But even if they weren't killing any embryos IVF is still going to lead to a dystopia where everyone is required to be genetically modified before birth.
As just a basic search will tell you, it was already attempted in communist countries last century. Because only deranged lunatics with no ethics would want to do this kind of thing. As humanity gets more deranged by the year I'm sure if human genome editing becomes normal then it will be attempted in the future with better technology that might actually succeed.
No it didn’t. 1. The technology doesn’t even exist now and 2. The things communist counties do the most is lie out their ass to project power.
An embryo develops from a zygote. In the video they talk about selecting an embryo from a catalog and the rest get destroyed. That's always how IVF has been: make a bunch of babies and destroying all but one that gets used and any others that get frozen for later use or destruction. But even if they weren't killing any embryos IVF is still going to lead to a dystopia where everyone is required to be genetically modified before birth.
Again you’re making up doomsday scenarios to justify your claims. IVF doesn’t “destroy all but one” either, it’s very rare for more than one embryo to survive in general, in most cases IVF happens because natural fertilization doesn’t occur. You’re literally complaining about wanting less babies because some other embryos don’t make it, why are you against life?
I always find it funny that the athiest retard response is to make abjectly absurd claims about a person being fictitious when he has more historical documentation than any other person alive in that time period. Was Herod not real either? How about Augustus?
It always amuses me when the godbuggerers pretend the crux of their argumentation isn't "and then he did a magic".
Even if, IF, jesus was a real person (and that's a hell of a weird name for that region and that time), you people never want to discuss his humanity, only his divinity and his magic. You dont care for his morality or his ethics except as it overlaps with him being king biggus magical dickus and telling people what to do.
You're clout chasing sycophants, pretending at virtue.
Aw! Did the retard get lost on the way to Reddit atheism? The Romans documented Jesus existing, so did the Pharisees, it wasn’t just the Bible. You don’t even believe he existed so what do you know of his morals or ethics? Fascinating you claim superior knowledge yet you can’t even do the most basic verification.
Last I checked Jesus acted against nature too. IVF doesn’t make parents less parents, unless this kid is being used for surrogacy it’s a non issue to want healthier children. Go forth and multiply.
I don't know what you mean by he acted against nature. Walked on water? Healed the sick? Don't you see those things are completely different than breeding humans with apes, normalizing human genome editing or ensuring that all future generations of humans would be selected and grown in labs by killing several other developing babies for each one that is born?
Can you show me anywhere this is happening? I’ll wait.
Again that’s not IVF. You’re making up imaginary scenarios. Embryo selection isn’t abortion, there is no zygote.
As just a basic search will tell you, it was already attempted in communist countries last century. Because only deranged lunatics with no ethics would want to do this kind of thing. As humanity gets more deranged by the year I'm sure if human genome editing becomes normal then it will be attempted in the future with better technology that might actually succeed.
An embryo develops from a zygote. In the video they talk about selecting an embryo from a catalog and the rest get destroyed. That's always how IVF has been: make a bunch of babies and destroying all but one that gets used and any others that get frozen for later use or destruction. But even if they weren't killing any embryos IVF is still going to lead to a dystopia where everyone is required to be genetically modified before birth.
No it didn’t. 1. The technology doesn’t even exist now and 2. The things communist counties do the most is lie out their ass to project power.
Again you’re making up doomsday scenarios to justify your claims. IVF doesn’t “destroy all but one” either, it’s very rare for more than one embryo to survive in general, in most cases IVF happens because natural fertilization doesn’t occur. You’re literally complaining about wanting less babies because some other embryos don’t make it, why are you against life?
Jesus isn't real, sir.
You can't just bring magic into a conversation about reality.
I always find it funny that the athiest retard response is to make abjectly absurd claims about a person being fictitious when he has more historical documentation than any other person alive in that time period. Was Herod not real either? How about Augustus?
I would easier believe in Christ's miracles than the leftist welfare state ever delivering its promised utopia.
It always amuses me when the godbuggerers pretend the crux of their argumentation isn't "and then he did a magic".
Even if, IF, jesus was a real person (and that's a hell of a weird name for that region and that time), you people never want to discuss his humanity, only his divinity and his magic. You dont care for his morality or his ethics except as it overlaps with him being king biggus magical dickus and telling people what to do.
You're clout chasing sycophants, pretending at virtue.
Aw! Did the retard get lost on the way to Reddit atheism? The Romans documented Jesus existing, so did the Pharisees, it wasn’t just the Bible. You don’t even believe he existed so what do you know of his morals or ethics? Fascinating you claim superior knowledge yet you can’t even do the most basic verification.
Christ has more documentation of His existence than the theory of evolution does lol.
Cry harder, atheist.
You're right, "Josh" is a crazy name, bro. Hella sus. I think you just put the nail in Christianity.