I don't know what you mean by he acted against nature. Walked on water? Healed the sick? Don't you see those things are completely different than breeding humans with apes, normalizing human genome editing or ensuring that all future generations of humans would be selected and grown in labs by killing several other developing babies for each one that is born?
Don't you see those things are completely different than breeding humans with apes
Can you show me anywhere this is happening? I’ll wait.
normalizing human genome editing or ensuring that all future generations of humans would be selected and grown in labs by killing several other developing babies for each one that is born.
Again that’s not IVF. You’re making up imaginary scenarios. Embryo selection isn’t abortion, there is no zygote.
Can you show me anywhere this is happening? I’ll wait.
As just a basic search will tell you, it was already attempted in communist countries last century. Because only deranged lunatics with no ethics would want to do this kind of thing. As humanity gets more deranged by the year I'm sure if human genome editing becomes normal then it will be attempted in the future with better technology that might actually succeed.
Embryo selection isn’t abortion, there is no zygote.
An embryo develops from a zygote. In the video they talk about selecting an embryo from a catalog and the rest get destroyed. That's always how IVF has been: make a bunch of babies and destroying all but one that gets used and any others that get frozen for later use or destruction. But even if they weren't killing any embryos IVF is still going to lead to a dystopia where everyone is required to be genetically modified before birth.
As just a basic search will tell you, it was already attempted in communist countries last century. Because only deranged lunatics with no ethics would want to do this kind of thing. As humanity gets more deranged by the year I'm sure if human genome editing becomes normal then it will be attempted in the future with better technology that might actually succeed.
No it didn’t. 1. The technology doesn’t even exist now and 2. The things communist counties do the most is lie out their ass to project power.
An embryo develops from a zygote. In the video they talk about selecting an embryo from a catalog and the rest get destroyed. That's always how IVF has been: make a bunch of babies and destroying all but one that gets used and any others that get frozen for later use or destruction. But even if they weren't killing any embryos IVF is still going to lead to a dystopia where everyone is required to be genetically modified before birth.
Again you’re making up doomsday scenarios to justify your claims. IVF doesn’t “destroy all but one” either, it’s very rare for more than one embryo to survive in general, in most cases IVF happens because natural fertilization doesn’t occur. You’re literally complaining about wanting less babies because some other embryos don’t make it, why are you against life?
I don't know what you mean by he acted against nature. Walked on water? Healed the sick? Don't you see those things are completely different than breeding humans with apes, normalizing human genome editing or ensuring that all future generations of humans would be selected and grown in labs by killing several other developing babies for each one that is born?
Can you show me anywhere this is happening? I’ll wait.
Again that’s not IVF. You’re making up imaginary scenarios. Embryo selection isn’t abortion, there is no zygote.
As just a basic search will tell you, it was already attempted in communist countries last century. Because only deranged lunatics with no ethics would want to do this kind of thing. As humanity gets more deranged by the year I'm sure if human genome editing becomes normal then it will be attempted in the future with better technology that might actually succeed.
An embryo develops from a zygote. In the video they talk about selecting an embryo from a catalog and the rest get destroyed. That's always how IVF has been: make a bunch of babies and destroying all but one that gets used and any others that get frozen for later use or destruction. But even if they weren't killing any embryos IVF is still going to lead to a dystopia where everyone is required to be genetically modified before birth.
No it didn’t. 1. The technology doesn’t even exist now and 2. The things communist counties do the most is lie out their ass to project power.
Again you’re making up doomsday scenarios to justify your claims. IVF doesn’t “destroy all but one” either, it’s very rare for more than one embryo to survive in general, in most cases IVF happens because natural fertilization doesn’t occur. You’re literally complaining about wanting less babies because some other embryos don’t make it, why are you against life?