Man, libertarians have been really showing thier ass lately
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (82)
sorted by:
NewsFlash: libertarianism only works in a moral, educated and homogenous population. We have none of those things right now. Going to bat for your enemies isn't principles, it's suicidal autism
Every system works under those circumstances.
Yeah the system itself is much less important than the people within it.
Nah man, it's the magic dirt. But the dirt also magically decays at the exact same time diversity is forced onto the population. Coincidentally. It's definitely the magic dirt.
Wrong. A socialist/communist system does not work under any circumstances because markets are too large and varied for any person to manage.
And yet Whites survived those systems. Whites are getting wiped out under capitalism.
Millions dead under communism, whites still putting up a fight under "capitalism". I know which I prefer
(((Capitalism))) is a race to the bottom. There will always be hordes of semi-literate apes willing to undercut fair wages with slave labor.
Look up the Icelandic free states period. Its pretty libertarian.
waow
Yes, and its an interesting period that people should read about
If you had a libertarian democracy, then millions of illegals would enter tomorrow and vote themselves a sharia theocracy with all your stuff given away as a jizyah
This is why although I've said I lean heavily towards Libertarianism (because in reality I'm more aligned with Lockean Liberalism which could be confused with Libertarianism); I'm really more of a Militarist Minarchist.
A moral, educated, and homogenous population isn't enough. You need complete armamentation, and a marshal society. Really, even outside of Liberal philosophy, the only societies that ever respected individual rights and liberties were societies where the population was trained, equipped, and on-call for military service. Effectively, such societies had governments that accepted that autocracy couldn't work, and that they could quickly end up being executed by the general population that was also their army. As such, it made a hell of a lot more sense to betray no one, and keep the soldiering population happy with reasonable governance. State craft was also better because it meant that the political leadership was also the officer corps and only got that way through trust from subordinates, agreeableness with higher-ups, and competence of command. Before America, we only ever really saw this in England, Switzerland, and the Sikh Confederation.
If everyone is capable of serving with one another in a military capacity, you've just achieved the morality, education, and homogeneity that you're looking for; but now you can actually use it.
Basically renaming globalism as "free trade"