A few weeks ago: "regime change is bad" was updated to "regime change is good". This was a great success, so now new updates are being released.
Now, there is a new update: "must not be infringed" now means "if you're carrying a concealed gun at a protest, you are a domestic terrorist and will be summarily executed after being disarmed and restrained."
Please prepare for your next update, due to be released in a couple of months. In "We oppose Middle Eastern quagmires", strike the word 'oppose' and insert 'support'.
Thank you for your attention to this matter, and remember to keep trusting the plan.
This is more shitlib conjecture from you. Retarded leftists have been engaged in an actual insurrection, the only thing that has been infringed is the rights of the non-protestors because Trump is too much of a pussy to actually put his foot down, invoke the insurrection act and do what is needed to be done. Historically, soldiers wouldn’t have batted an eye flat out shooting the armed retard in the first place for forcing a safeguard, their biggest mistake, like with Floyd, was actually attempting to wrestle him down in the first place.
He's not wrong. I've heard the sentiment floating around this week of "you're not intending to peacefully protest if you bring a gun with you to the protest". As if carrying a concealed weapon is intent to maliciously wield it rather than a precautionary measure of self defense. That idea is out there in the wild right now.
The problem lies with him being a part of an organization intending to carry out violence and disruption. People aren't articulating why it's a problem for this dude and his cohorts to have a gun at a "protest."
Apparently, being part of an organization intending to carry out violence against LEOs isn't a problem because they aren't being arrested en mass. These people are keeping a more detailed hit list of ICE agents than the FBI has on them.
If they'd taken him at his home, in the middle of the night, he might be alive now.
I personally think Minnesota needs to be put under marital law. If I were in charge Walz would be awaiting trial for sedition and insurrection
The idea you can utilize self defense in the act of committing a crime is even more wild. People have bent over for leftist despotism so long they forgot the purpose of guns.
There is nothing wrong with showing up to a protest and waving your dumb signs around and chanting slogans while also having a glock in your waistband holster that you go everywhere with every day as a normally as making sure you have your keys before you leave the house. That is not the same thing as deciding that a protest provides ample cover and soft targets and therefor deciding to bring a weapon to score some easy kills. There seems to be a lot of conflation of these two scenarios going on right now and it is dishonest.
Does this mook deserve to get popped? Yes, but not because he had his every day carry on him. He deserves to get popped because he was fighting with law enforcement and because he's a traitor to the nation. The gun in his back pocket doesn't even enter into the equation.
I wish they would get at least half as angry about leftist “protesters” as they did about J6