Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

67
Why was this allowed in the first place (twitter.com)
posted 146 days ago by Ahaus667 146 days ago by Ahaus667 +67 / -0
23 comments share
23 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
▲ 29 ▼
– undecidedmask2 29 points 146 days ago +29 / -0

You can’t operate a high-trust legal system in a low-trust society. There’s a small but slowly growing number of right wingers who are even beginning to turn on the constitution, because it’s clearly not working anymore due to this shift in attitude.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– covok48 19 points 146 days ago +19 / -0

The Constitution was made by Whites for Whites.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– 5Cats 5 points 146 days ago +5 / -0

No. The Constitution was written by sane & rational people FOR sane and rational people.
Leftists are neither. The Democrat Party is overrun with leftist & they like it like that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 9 points 146 days ago +9 / -0

The simple truth is that whites are the only group that even has the potential to maintain the Constitution. The fact that white leftists exist doesn't invalidate this.

Right wing Hispanics are good as allies but Hispanics as a whole are not going to preserve constitutional freedoms. They quite literally never have. Without white leadership you can go ahead and stick a fork in the First Amendment.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 14 points 146 days ago +14 / -0

There’s a small but slowly growing number of right wingers who are even beginning to turn on the constitution, because it’s clearly not working anymore due to this shift in attitude.

That's the most troubling part of this. Kind of reminds me of the Section 230 debate when some right wingers started to clamor for the protection to be repealed so Twitter could be sued for the behavior of left wingers. In the end, that would have gone nowhere because leftist judges would have thrown out anything significant, and the government would be happy to effectively destroy discussion on the Internet.

The problem is the people, not the document.

The government wants people to get so mad that they turn against the Constitution. They'd be happy to shred the First Amendment.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 7 points 146 days ago +7 / -0

I posted a while back on the high cost of a low trust society. The beauty of the constitution is that it can always be reset, and the original is very limiting on who gets a say.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Theacefospades 2 points 145 days ago +2 / -0

I've been anti constitution for like 10 years lol.

It was ubdermined in exactly the way that the people who wrote it predicted it would be undermined when they compromised with the retards of the time.

As it's said, it either creared the current situation or was too weak to prevent it. Either way it is insufficient and unfit to exist.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy