No, birth rates are down because of feminism. You can’t empower women to spend 75% of their fertility window not having children and then expect birth rates not to collapse.
“Muh economy” is pure cope; the poorest people have the most children, and virtually all of our ancestors were poorer than any of us are now.
Poor people have children as economic gains, because it usually means more welfare and extra working hands depending on what demographic of poor. They are happily willing to put 3+ to a room in a shack, and jam a bottle of regular ass milk into a newborn.
Its the people above poor, the lower middle class, where the economic issue arises, because it does look prohibitively expensive from the outside without the crutch of welfare and taking the full burden of it on two full time working parents alone while following "the rules" of paying for things like formula and cosleeping.
Feminism plays a huge part in why that happens to be the case, but the monetary angle is what most people are looking at when they consciously decide against having a 3rd/4th/so on to up the rates.
I think there's also been a long-standing cultural attitude that really tries to push how much of a burden children can be.
I mean admittedly, it is hugely based on reality. Children take a lot of time, work, and money. There's can be a heavy mental and emotional toll, and it can go as far as to strain one or both parents' physical health too.
But it's been pushed way too harshly with a broad one-sided stroke. To the point of scaring away a LOT of potential parents. Which syncs together with just how many millennials have gone on to become adult-children of some variety or another.
Not that everyone's well suited to be a good parent, but actually taking such responsibility seriously (without running away from it completely) is a pretty important step towards actually becoming one.
People treat every single aspect of children as this huge financial burden to a point where its become accepted common knowledge, and its nothing more than a show of how retarded most people are.
Like, people kept reminding me that it was like 20k dollars to have a child in a hospital leading up to my first. And then the bill came at round 4k, expensive but not absurd, because as it turns out if you don't spend a week "recovering" in their bed and get out as soon as you're able you don't get charged as much.
The only legitimate concern is the babysitting versus two full time workers issue, which is hard to manage because those things are fucking expensive on any salary. But that's why you don't burn every bridge with your relatives over nonsense prior, like most people seem to do.
I'd be concerned if you actually liked me. We are not of the same spirit. You are of a jewish, son of satan spirit. John 8:44 You do not understand the truth because the truth is not in you.
Basically everything bad about modern society comes from jews.
People here have no idea how incredible a White Nation is. One void of jewry. It's incredible. Beyond your dreams. Probably paradise compared to the ZOGland you live in now.
Men and women alike are also working more hours than medieval peasants.
You'd think technology making economies vastly more productive would have the opposite effect, but that's never been the case. That surplus productivity just goes to shareholder profits, and propping up those sectors of the economy that do not produce anything at all, like banking.
With the decreasing amount of spare time to actually raise a family, children are raised by the state, television, and the Internet. Or not at all.
Birth rates are probably down because we have eroded the young and working class’s ability to support a family on a working wage.
By undercutting their salaries by importing millions of migrants
No, birth rates are down because of feminism. You can’t empower women to spend 75% of their fertility window not having children and then expect birth rates not to collapse.
“Muh economy” is pure cope; the poorest people have the most children, and virtually all of our ancestors were poorer than any of us are now.
World food programme is a massive flop, instead of feeding people they have been breeding people. But that's probably by design.
Poor people have children as economic gains, because it usually means more welfare and extra working hands depending on what demographic of poor. They are happily willing to put 3+ to a room in a shack, and jam a bottle of regular ass milk into a newborn.
Its the people above poor, the lower middle class, where the economic issue arises, because it does look prohibitively expensive from the outside without the crutch of welfare and taking the full burden of it on two full time working parents alone while following "the rules" of paying for things like formula and cosleeping.
Feminism plays a huge part in why that happens to be the case, but the monetary angle is what most people are looking at when they consciously decide against having a 3rd/4th/so on to up the rates.
Why can't you just say what it is?
The reproductive have more kids to profit off leeching off the superior productive people who work and pay taxes.
Depression-era families still had proper Christian values, not (((media))) and dating apps telling women to kill their babies and be whores.
The answer can be both.
I think there's also been a long-standing cultural attitude that really tries to push how much of a burden children can be.
I mean admittedly, it is hugely based on reality. Children take a lot of time, work, and money. There's can be a heavy mental and emotional toll, and it can go as far as to strain one or both parents' physical health too.
But it's been pushed way too harshly with a broad one-sided stroke. To the point of scaring away a LOT of potential parents. Which syncs together with just how many millennials have gone on to become adult-children of some variety or another.
Not that everyone's well suited to be a good parent, but actually taking such responsibility seriously (without running away from it completely) is a pretty important step towards actually becoming one.
People treat every single aspect of children as this huge financial burden to a point where its become accepted common knowledge, and its nothing more than a show of how retarded most people are.
Like, people kept reminding me that it was like 20k dollars to have a child in a hospital leading up to my first. And then the bill came at round 4k, expensive but not absurd, because as it turns out if you don't spend a week "recovering" in their bed and get out as soon as you're able you don't get charged as much.
The only legitimate concern is the babysitting versus two full time workers issue, which is hard to manage because those things are fucking expensive on any salary. But that's why you don't burn every bridge with your relatives over nonsense prior, like most people seem to do.
As a father, i've never seen my children as a burden. I even changed dirty diapers with grace.
I see a cat or a dog as a burden. A pet that i can't eat is a burden.
You're fucked in the head though.
I interpret insults from you as compliments.
I'd be concerned if you actually liked me. We are not of the same spirit. You are of a jewish, son of satan spirit. John 8:44 You do not understand the truth because the truth is not in you.
Yeah, and nonwhites get a ton of benefits to subsidize their breeding. White families get dick.
Don't forget hyperregulation by HOAs and other socialist groups preventing wealth creation at home.
Look at the history and those pushing "Feminism", and where their seats of power are/ were in a academia.l and government.
Most of those leading that movement of destruction against White women were then and are now lesbian jews.
There's your answer more than anything else.
Every Single Time
Basically everything bad about modern society comes from jews.
People here have no idea how incredible a White Nation is. One void of jewry. It's incredible. Beyond your dreams. Probably paradise compared to the ZOGland you live in now.
I know how incredible a nation free of Nazis could be. It's time to start killing them.
Men and women alike are also working more hours than medieval peasants.
You'd think technology making economies vastly more productive would have the opposite effect, but that's never been the case. That surplus productivity just goes to shareholder profits, and propping up those sectors of the economy that do not produce anything at all, like banking.
With the decreasing amount of spare time to actually raise a family, children are raised by the state, television, and the Internet. Or not at all.
Inflation has been used to increase asset prices and suppress wages. So yes - we work more hours than medieval slaves.
This is by design