Beyond the 'this is a trash religion when their members are equal to cultists in their actions and behaviour' (and I have the same response for other religions, Christianity just has a MASSIVE institutional corruption issue).
Isn't that face covering ONLY meant for when they are old enough to be SEXUALLY active!? Like this is a self confession if your giving that to children.
One of Pedo Mo's wives (piss be upon him) was the 9 year old daughter of his best friend.
If the man who these savages say is the perfect human and should be emulated in every way likes them that young, then no shit they'd see prepubescent girls as sexually active.
And another of his wives was his first cousin, which is why his followers have spent the centuries since inbreeding themselves retarded. Also, pedo mo was gay and let a bunch of men called zutts 'ride' him according to a hadith that ends with another man giving mo a lap pillow.
I think one of his wives was his nephew's ex wife too or something?
Plus, I remember reading somewhere that when some other mussie asked about why he has more than 3 wives, his explanation boiled down to "Because god said I could, mkay?"
Yeah, I get it though. Muslims are like the extreme opposite direction of feminism, but honestly, I wouldn’t have a problem with White men forcing that sort of lifestyle on women, not Islam per se, but force them to be extremely submissive just to get rid of the damage radical feminism does. .
Fuck women’s rights, there’s a reason our forefathers wouldn’t let women vote and wouldn’t give them any real rights at all. Women will kill your nation if you let them. They didn’t build society, they don’t recognize what’s at stake with the regarded policies they support, so if their emotions tell them to dismantle what we built, it’s no big deal to her until the chaos effects her life directly.
but honestly, I wouldn’t have a problem with White men forcing that sort of lifestyle on women, not Islam per say, but force them to be extremely submissive just to get rid of the damage radical feminism does
That's called returning to tradition. No sharia needed, just look at how your own ancestors dealt with women before the 20th century.
I mean, I literally stated “NOT ISLAM” in the part you shared. there’s no need to clarify “no sharia” as if I suggested that as an option. I put it that way specifically so no spergs would be like “you think Islam is great and want us to become Muslims?” and yet here we are, as if my statement needed more clarification in that regard more than what I already said.
You need to clarify which “tradition” we’d need to follow since tradition is different from place to place just as much now as it was pre-1900. Surely some western society’s were semi-progressive with allowing women to have a voice and influence in society, France was probably fairly progressive like that, while other places were probably very restrictive….that’s all debatable.
The only thing that needed to be clarified in my statement is “how restrictive would you prefer society to be toward women? I think women should be able to choose the man they want to marry but beyond that, they shouldn’t have a say in anything else aside from basic family matters, nothing that would impact the family in a serious way, and definitely no say when it comes to policy that will impact society at large. I don’t support stoning women over minor transgressions like they do in Islam, but I do think backtalk from a wife or kids should be met with physical repercussions, not severe, but enough to remind them who leads the family and makes the decisions. A husband should be able to restrict which people their wife has as friends, some women are a very bad influence you don’t want in your wife’s life. idk if I support throwing a woman’s ass in a looney bin and moving on with life like she never existed just because she talked back a few times or whatever, or because the man found a more attractive woman to shack up with, that did happen in the late 1800’s to early 1900’s in the U.S., seems very cruel.
A school district in Ontario asked parents to not send ham or pork with their kids lunches so that "other students" wouldn't be offended. (Not Jews, eh?)
Dude looks like his parents were cousins. :')
Dude was ready to tear that 8 year old open.
Evil Religion.
Rape her or beat her? Or both? Does quoran have a guide for which order to use?
If she's under 9 it's the first one then the second, if she's older, reverse them.
Beyond the 'this is a trash religion when their members are equal to cultists in their actions and behaviour' (and I have the same response for other religions, Christianity just has a MASSIVE institutional corruption issue).
Isn't that face covering ONLY meant for when they are old enough to be SEXUALLY active!? Like this is a self confession if your giving that to children.
One of Pedo Mo's wives (piss be upon him) was the 9 year old daughter of his best friend.
If the man who these savages say is the perfect human and should be emulated in every way likes them that young, then no shit they'd see prepubescent girls as sexually active.
And another of his wives was his first cousin, which is why his followers have spent the centuries since inbreeding themselves retarded. Also, pedo mo was gay and let a bunch of men called zutts 'ride' him according to a hadith that ends with another man giving mo a lap pillow.
I think one of his wives was his nephew's ex wife too or something?
Plus, I remember reading somewhere that when some other mussie asked about why he has more than 3 wives, his explanation boiled down to "Because god said I could, mkay?"
Pedo Prophet married her at 6, raped her at 9.
IIRC, the bit about waiting is only in shiite writings. So the other sects believe their prophet raped a six year old.
They see your standard UK school uniform as "dressing like a whore" and that's their explanation for Rotherham.
"old enough" dos not apply, these dudes fuck goats
It's always creepy seeing muslims trying to act like regular wholesome people like we don't know they're itching to behead some infidels with the boys
Is that his daughter or his wife?
Yes.
Based IMO. He just knows that if some brownoid like himself sees her face they will instantly rape her.
that's the real reason why they veil their women
in pre-islamic arab culture these sand monkeys would literally raze entire villages in order to find women to rape
sometimes the villages would take drastic measures and literally buried their women alive until the raiders left
being a woman in sand nigger land pre-islamic times must've been the most nightmarish experience you can imagine
just a "culture" dedicated to evil
But we should import them here because authentic kebabs
Yeah, I get it though. Muslims are like the extreme opposite direction of feminism, but honestly, I wouldn’t have a problem with White men forcing that sort of lifestyle on women, not Islam per se, but force them to be extremely submissive just to get rid of the damage radical feminism does. .
Look at what this female judge just did in Canada
https://www.junonews.com/p/op-ed-judges-are-remaking-constitutional
Fuck women’s rights, there’s a reason our forefathers wouldn’t let women vote and wouldn’t give them any real rights at all. Women will kill your nation if you let them. They didn’t build society, they don’t recognize what’s at stake with the regarded policies they support, so if their emotions tell them to dismantle what we built, it’s no big deal to her until the chaos effects her life directly.
That's called returning to tradition. No sharia needed, just look at how your own ancestors dealt with women before the 20th century.
I mean, I literally stated “NOT ISLAM” in the part you shared. there’s no need to clarify “no sharia” as if I suggested that as an option. I put it that way specifically so no spergs would be like “you think Islam is great and want us to become Muslims?” and yet here we are, as if my statement needed more clarification in that regard more than what I already said.
You need to clarify which “tradition” we’d need to follow since tradition is different from place to place just as much now as it was pre-1900. Surely some western society’s were semi-progressive with allowing women to have a voice and influence in society, France was probably fairly progressive like that, while other places were probably very restrictive….that’s all debatable.
The only thing that needed to be clarified in my statement is “how restrictive would you prefer society to be toward women? I think women should be able to choose the man they want to marry but beyond that, they shouldn’t have a say in anything else aside from basic family matters, nothing that would impact the family in a serious way, and definitely no say when it comes to policy that will impact society at large. I don’t support stoning women over minor transgressions like they do in Islam, but I do think backtalk from a wife or kids should be met with physical repercussions, not severe, but enough to remind them who leads the family and makes the decisions. A husband should be able to restrict which people their wife has as friends, some women are a very bad influence you don’t want in your wife’s life. idk if I support throwing a woman’s ass in a looney bin and moving on with life like she never existed just because she talked back a few times or whatever, or because the man found a more attractive woman to shack up with, that did happen in the late 1800’s to early 1900’s in the U.S., seems very cruel.
I was agreeing and amplifying, bro. So many people going on about "White sharia" when all we have to do is look to our own ancestors.
Yup Canada is screwed.
A school district in Ontario asked parents to not send ham or pork with their kids lunches so that "other students" wouldn't be offended. (Not Jews, eh?)