Tyler Robinson most definitely didn't kill Charlie Kirk. The campus was covered in security cameras and if he did we would have seen footage by now that would prove it.
But instead we only got one still frame we don't even know when it is even from and cut video footage of someone running away and jumping off the roof without a rifle from a camera that was covering the shooting position and would've most definitely filmed the supposed roof assassin taking the shot. And climbing onto the roof, assembling the gun, disassembling the gun and going into a sprint. But we haven't seen any of that yet.
Add to that all the other inconsistencies and it is guaranteed that Tyler did not kill Charlie.
Only thing I'll disagree with here is that we don't know if Tyler Robinson killed Kirk or not, but because no of the other "evidence" you mention has been released, it's not unreasonable to assume that they don't actually have it.
I saw this recent video of the guy who questioned kirk last, practicing his look of shock and horror before the event. Then doing the exact same action as charlie was shot. Crisis actor is what they called him.
I wish I could find it. It was the guy who asked the question as Charlie was shot, grabbing at his head and freaking out before the rally, which he then did exactly the same when Charlie was shot in front of him.
I've seen the video. It looks like he's reacting to something and not practicing. Even if he's practicing what does it tell us? Nothing. It doesn't change anything about the obvious major inconsistencies in the official story.
Like I already said. George Zinn is far more important. He actually deliberately
did something to distract people.
Why would you have seen footage of it? The college doesn't want to advertise how easy it is walk onto campus, climb onto their roofs with a gun, assassinate somebody and then escape the scene.
Prosecutors never show their evidence to the public unless they are corrupt and trying to do politics.
The only way you'd have seen more of this footage is if somebody hacked into the college and stole it in the week or whatever that they store old camera footage or he happened to be in some random selfie video a student was taking and they realized it and shared it.
The FBI released the cut roof footage. So unless they release the full length of it I'm assuming they're lying through their teeth. Because what we got shows exactly nothing.
If you want to trust the FBI and the justice system after all that has happened because you want to believe Tyler killed Charlie... be my guest. I'm going to trust my pattern recognition ability and will not ignore red flags.
FBI didn't 'release the footage', they showed part of it in a press conference.
Are you seriously trying to argue semantics now? When it doesn't even make sense? They showed it during a press conference. A public press conference. Which means the FBI released the footage to the public. And the TV networks showed that footage. Not screen recordings of that footage but the actual video footage itself.
Why would the college release the footage? It makes no sense for them to do that.
Really? I mean... really? We've been talking about what the FBI has and hasn't released and now you're trying to spin it that I'm saying the college should release the footage?
Tyler Robinson most definitely didn't kill Charlie Kirk. The campus was covered in security cameras and if he did we would have seen footage by now that would prove it.
But instead we only got one still frame we don't even know when it is even from and cut video footage of someone running away and jumping off the roof without a rifle from a camera that was covering the shooting position and would've most definitely filmed the supposed roof assassin taking the shot. And climbing onto the roof, assembling the gun, disassembling the gun and going into a sprint. But we haven't seen any of that yet.
Add to that all the other inconsistencies and it is guaranteed that Tyler did not kill Charlie.
Only thing I'll disagree with here is that we don't know if Tyler Robinson killed Kirk or not, but because no of the other "evidence" you mention has been released, it's not unreasonable to assume that they don't actually have it.
I saw this recent video of the guy who questioned kirk last, practicing his look of shock and horror before the event. Then doing the exact same action as charlie was shot. Crisis actor is what they called him.
Eh... that one is quite the stretch. George Zinn on the other hand was most definitely instructed to claim he shot Charlie.
https://scored.co/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARJYFosjM/practicing-crisis-actor/c
I wish I could find it. It was the guy who asked the question as Charlie was shot, grabbing at his head and freaking out before the rally, which he then did exactly the same when Charlie was shot in front of him.
I've seen the video. It looks like he's reacting to something and not practicing. Even if he's practicing what does it tell us? Nothing. It doesn't change anything about the obvious major inconsistencies in the official story.
Like I already said. George Zinn is far more important. He actually deliberately did something to distract people.
Why would you have seen footage of it? The college doesn't want to advertise how easy it is walk onto campus, climb onto their roofs with a gun, assassinate somebody and then escape the scene.
Prosecutors never show their evidence to the public unless they are corrupt and trying to do politics.
The only way you'd have seen more of this footage is if somebody hacked into the college and stole it in the week or whatever that they store old camera footage or he happened to be in some random selfie video a student was taking and they realized it and shared it.
The FBI released the cut roof footage. So unless they release the full length of it I'm assuming they're lying through their teeth. Because what we got shows exactly nothing.
If you want to trust the FBI and the justice system after all that has happened because you want to believe Tyler killed Charlie... be my guest. I'm going to trust my pattern recognition ability and will not ignore red flags.
FBI didn't 'release the footage', they showed part of it in a press conference.
Don't worry about what I believe, what you should worry is that your conclusions are based on false and nonsensical premises.
Why would the college release the footage? It makes no sense for them to do that.
Are you seriously trying to argue semantics now? When it doesn't even make sense? They showed it during a press conference. A public press conference. Which means the FBI released the footage to the public. And the TV networks showed that footage. Not screen recordings of that footage but the actual video footage itself.
Really? I mean... really? We've been talking about what the FBI has and hasn't released and now you're trying to spin it that I'm saying the college should release the footage?