One side will always realise they can cement power by expanding the franchise.
It starts with only landed men. But then the left side realise they can get more support for their positions by lowering the standards, less land needed. So when they're in power, they do so. Then all men. Then women. Then reduce the voting age to 18. Now 16.
Women voting is inevitable when you have voting. Voting is the issue.
The problem is not voting but extending the vote to people that do not contribute to society.
It should be a net tax payer system, where only those that are not parasite choose how to spend their money.
Women are welfare sponges, even if they work because the government pay companies to reach a diversity quota.
Then you need to zoom out a bit because what you reffer to A is actually B and what you think is B is actually C. What is the actual A? Human malice. There is no system in existance that can address for human malice.
I heard Andrew Wilson talking about raising the voting age to 35. The rational is that you can't run for president until 35 because a younger person couldn't handle the responsibilities of the office. And since your vote is selecting that person, you wouldn't make a good decision about who holds office until the same age.
Raising the floor would also require lowering the ceiling lest boomer types groups continue to exert disproportionate influence over the rest and at their expense.
The problem there is that many problems affect the youth first, look at the dating and labor markets, those who already got theirs are incapable of seeing any problem and just assume that it's us that are at fault for their being no jobs looking to hire white men and women having insanely high standards.
The real problem is voting.
One side will always realise they can cement power by expanding the franchise.
It starts with only landed men. But then the left side realise they can get more support for their positions by lowering the standards, less land needed. So when they're in power, they do so. Then all men. Then women. Then reduce the voting age to 18. Now 16.
Women voting is inevitable when you have voting. Voting is the issue.
The real problem is thinking voting is anything but a scam.
The problem is not voting but extending the vote to people that do not contribute to society.
It should be a net tax payer system, where only those that are not parasite choose how to spend their money.
Women are welfare sponges, even if they work because the government pay companies to reach a diversity quota.
If A inevitably leads to B, A is the issue*
Then you need to zoom out a bit because what you reffer to A is actually B and what you think is B is actually C. What is the actual A? Human malice. There is no system in existance that can address for human malice.
I heard Andrew Wilson talking about raising the voting age to 35. The rational is that you can't run for president until 35 because a younger person couldn't handle the responsibilities of the office. And since your vote is selecting that person, you wouldn't make a good decision about who holds office until the same age.
It doesn't matter how high you raise the voting age if the system itself is fundamentally corrupt.
Raising the floor would also require lowering the ceiling lest boomer types groups continue to exert disproportionate influence over the rest and at their expense.
Great point
The problem there is that many problems affect the youth first, look at the dating and labor markets, those who already got theirs are incapable of seeing any problem and just assume that it's us that are at fault for their being no jobs looking to hire white men and women having insanely high standards.
I think you are making a good point but adding the dating stuff makes you sound like a whiner
The dating side of things is absolutely valid and I'm sick of everyone pretending that it isn't.