Mic Drop: Kirk Assassinated by Weaponized Lavalier - Stew Peters Network
The Tyler Robinson rooftop sniper hoax is crumbling after video evidence showing Israel's signature exploding lavalier mic blasting Charlie Kirk's throat, with accomplices snatching the bomb and detonator like pros in a heist. These Mossad monste...
I think some people are so used to finding conspiracy theories that they are "finding" one just to make themselves feel sane.
I believe a bit of grifting is going on, as well.
This is not the first time Stew Peters has done this. I used to subscribe to him, but when he sperged out once too many times I had to cut bait.
I don't know how I feel about the mic argument, but undeniably, someone in the front row grabs something off Kirk or the ground near his body and runs off.
A gay communist shot him with a stolen hunting rifle. Fixating and obsessing over some meaningless detail is a complete waste of time .
Almost all these theories rely on the old trick of "if you can't prove this 1% thing that looks off, then the other 99% are now invalid forever."
Its literally the CSI effect on real life, where the 'thing' is solved by finding an exact series of events and details that happened to the T and it wraps itself up nice in a coherent box that fits their personal biases and theories only totally coincidentally.
It's because they have a jew fetish and want to distract from the actual problems of leftist terrorism (and especially trannies).
Normally I disagree with you on most things, but in this we are aligned in that too many people are so obsessed with Jews that they cannot fathom anything in existence is anything but a Jewish plot and feel the need to bend every detail in existence back in that direction.
Jews and their nonsense are a huge foundation and backer of Leftist terrorism, and they are no doubt heavily involved here simply because they have touched so much almost nothing doesn't involve them anymore. But they aren't the only part of it either.
now what could jews, leftist terrorism, and trannies all have in common?
They're simply not smart people and finding out about Jews oneshots them.
It doesn't matter. With the currently available footage there is no way to determine how exactly Charlie was killed. But what is possible to determine and has already been proven without a shadow of a doubt is that Tyler Robinson is a patsy and the FBI is lying through their teeth.
Source: conspiracy theorists
Source: functioning brain and eyes
I know that's something you don't possess considering you can't even shill in a non-retarded way.
Okay shortbus reject
your sources are candance owens tier stupid. She's going to get btfo'd in court and it's going to be fucking amazing.
You roll up in this thread all hot, are the first to bring up jews, provide zero evidence, and just insult anyone not buying it. You kikes are both unreal and hilarious lol
Thanks for your perpetually ongoing and always informative mask off moments!
It's really telling you retards turbocuck so hard you can't imagine someone telling you you're stupid isn't a jew.
Go back to conpro faggot
Unlike you I don't even bother watching Candace Owens.
i also have a functioning brain and eyes... if the argument is that he types like a retard that's a bad argument. i've seen a lot of dumbfuck lefties online in my quest to propagandize and some of them really are fucking weirdos that type like that. shocker, i know.
The obviously faked chat log is one of the least important inconsistencies in the official story.
The most damning evidence is the closeup video of Charlie getting shot. What we see is an exit wound not an entry wound. And if you think a 30-06 can be magically swallowed by a flimsy human neck without exiting and doing no damage besides punching an entry hole in it you might want to look up people shooting 30-06 at ballistic gel blocks on Youtube.
Then there's the fact of the security camera that was filming the spot from which Tyler supposedly shot Charlie but we only saw a shitty video of him running away. There is no video of him climbing up on the roof, assembling the gun, shooting Charlie and disassembling the gun. Only of him running away.
And then he assembled the gun again just to drop it in the woods somewhere after he already got away. Sounds plausible.
And the crime scene got sterilized after less than a week. Also after the shooting nobody bothered to actually secure it either. People were just taking shit left and right as they pleased.
There are plenty more inconsistencies, far more than there were in the Vegas shooting, but these examples should be enough to make anyone question the official narrative.
yeah... maybe. i don't know. my gut tells me this is a low-priority conspiracy that won't be solved and won't be successfully used to propagandize. whether via tranny or magic lapel explosive, israel's the one who killed him either way. if the leftist faggot who killed him is a patsy he's a horrible choice for one that you should exploit.
seriously, put yourself in a jew's shoes, you want to shake things up and protect yourself from the rising natsoc youth that seems to be gaining more and more ground. why wouldn't you make the patsy look like some crazy atomwaffen loonie? why make him a marxist degenerate that will lead right back to you if people study who created marxism and a lot of modern degeneracy?
The reasons for these assassinations are almost never as obvious as one might think they are. Nobody was aware how Israel was connected to JFKs assassination when it happened. That only came to light years after the fact.
Not sure about a Bond gadget execution but it sure as shit wasn't what the official story said.
On this we can agree. The official Narrative™ is always wrong in some way, big or small.
There's a lot that doesn't add up, but also a lot of misconceptions and, as much as I hate to use the propaganda word, "misinformation."
Some people are just misunderstanding things, which makes the official story seem even weirder than it actually is. One example is, the "rifle disassembly" narrative. A lot of people are under the impression that the official story from the feds is that he disassembled it on the roof, then reassembled it to leave in the woods, while somehow leaving the screwdriver on the roof. As I understand, they just misinterpreted this greatly, and the real story - true or not - is that he brought the rifle in a disassembled state to the roof, assembled it there, and it stayed that way till it was stashed in the woods.
But there are certainly actual weird claims, too. The text messages are incredibly odd. And the "manifesto" or whatever you want to call it is also very, very weird. That's a legitimately strange claim by the FBI...that the shooter left a note for his roommate (later claiming he wanted to take his secret to the grave)...who burned the note or something. But they have proof it existed, and what was on it. Because the roommate told them, I guess. But he's also cooperating...despite destroying evidence. I don't fucking know. The roommate and the FBI are both acting incredibly weirdly.
So I think there's probably a lot more going on than we know, but that doesn't mean it's as weird as exploding lav mics. The simplest conspiracy is the alleged shooter is the shooter, but there were feds (US, Israeli, or contractors) in his Discord chats and shit, spurring him on. That's pretty standard as far as these big events. But I don't believe the official story, which is not to say I think there was for sure a different shooter, or explosives, or foreign agents on the ground, or anything.
I just think conspiracy theories are neat. In high school, I sat around with buds are we reworked the prequels to make more sense. Now, we do that with fedgov bullshit. Doesn't mean it's what really happened. Just a nice exercise.
This one thing that I am sure of is that Taylor does not have a gun to place in the woods.