Great idea, and I followed, but it's kind of a mess right now. Hopefully it gets filled in a bit.
I don't think they should do stuff like this, either:
“I don't know if they support Kirk or not, but Bethesda certainly doesn't and this looks like a Skyrim killer. So unless they do something stupid in the mean time I recommend it to stick it to Bethesda”
Please keep the Charlie detector...actually Charlie related. This isn't hard.
I think they're also wrong about Tim Sweeney; he wasn't celebrating or defending the celebrators. I don't even like the dude, but people jumped and took him out of context.
Also, good on the Lords of the Fallen people, they keep impressing:
“One of the FEW Developers I have seen publicaly rebuke people celerbarating Sept 10, and will FIRE anyone who does it. SUPPORT THIS GAME! ”
I really, really don't like the gameplay changes to that new Lords of the Fallen game, but the devs have proven to be very based.
I loved the original game specifically because it was slow, plodding, and all the weapons had heft and mass in their use. The new game looks to play like a soulless Dark Souls clone with a generic custom character who is silent (but maybe I'm, wrong).
Even still, I may just pick up a copy just to support them even though I have zero intentions on playing the game.
Also, agreed about the Charlie Detector needing to stay Charlie-focused.
Please keep the Charlie detector...actually Charlie related. This isn't hard.
Everything is hard for the right. That's why every right-wing influencer is always peddling something. I get the impression that it's not about the ideas, but about making money. (Of course it is, but the left makes it less obvious.)
It's a mixed bag. I think there are plenty of people on the right who got into it because they actually believe it, but then see an opportunity to make money, and then get audience and/or sponsor captured. There are also grifters who were always grifters.
I think one of the big issues is the shadow networks and agencies. It's really hard to even get big enough to get an audience or sponsorship that could even capture you, if you're not already captured by some agency. The internet is fake and gay, and that's becoming more clear. The age of natural rise to fames are over, if they ever existed.
Followed and see that Bethesda is in my catalogue more than I thought it was.
I'm surprised, and pleased, to see that Kingdom Come: Deliverance is on the list. So it does seem to be sticking to the Charlie Kirk context and nothing else (For the moment).
As long as the curator sticks to the lines they've drawn I'm happy to be subscribed to their recommendations. Don't need no intersectional bleed with other topics trying to shave the cream off this crop.
That's why I was surprised. KCD1 was a hot topic when it released and was very well received by gamers. KCD2 decided to throw in all sorts of historically questionable content (Which clearly was enforced from those holding the purse strings) and so I thought they'd flipped to the side of ambition over reason.
So if they're a 'recommended' on the list, and the list is solely about 'not recommending' those celebrating Charlie Kirk's death so I guess they've at least held the line on that front.
I've not played KCD2 as I don't care for woke rewrites of history, but if KCD23 is about being a native Ghanaian and rounding up poor people from unarmed villages to sell them to the tribes on the shores of that continent for exploitation elsewhere I'll give it a look since it would be back to how things actually happened (As horrible as they might be).
Oh good, I was hoping someone had put something like this together.
The curation looks a bit haphazard though. For example they're recommending Tainted Grail because fuck Bethesda rather than verifying it as having any position at all on Charlie Kirk.
Maybe this will be like the Sweet Baby Inc stuff and we'll see a handful of groups emerge to track this stuff.
Great idea, and I followed, but it's kind of a mess right now. Hopefully it gets filled in a bit.
I don't think they should do stuff like this, either:
“I don't know if they support Kirk or not, but Bethesda certainly doesn't and this looks like a Skyrim killer. So unless they do something stupid in the mean time I recommend it to stick it to Bethesda”
Please keep the Charlie detector...actually Charlie related. This isn't hard.
I think they're also wrong about Tim Sweeney; he wasn't celebrating or defending the celebrators. I don't even like the dude, but people jumped and took him out of context.
Also, good on the Lords of the Fallen people, they keep impressing:
“One of the FEW Developers I have seen publicaly rebuke people celerbarating Sept 10, and will FIRE anyone who does it. SUPPORT THIS GAME! ”
I bought their game when they switched it back to male/female instead of body type 1/2. I’ll always drop money for based devs.
I really, really don't like the gameplay changes to that new Lords of the Fallen game, but the devs have proven to be very based.
I loved the original game specifically because it was slow, plodding, and all the weapons had heft and mass in their use. The new game looks to play like a soulless Dark Souls clone with a generic custom character who is silent (but maybe I'm, wrong).
Even still, I may just pick up a copy just to support them even though I have zero intentions on playing the game.
Also, agreed about the Charlie Detector needing to stay Charlie-focused.
Everything is hard for the right. That's why every right-wing influencer is always peddling something. I get the impression that it's not about the ideas, but about making money. (Of course it is, but the left makes it less obvious.)
It's a mixed bag. I think there are plenty of people on the right who got into it because they actually believe it, but then see an opportunity to make money, and then get audience and/or sponsor captured. There are also grifters who were always grifters.
I think one of the big issues is the shadow networks and agencies. It's really hard to even get big enough to get an audience or sponsorship that could even capture you, if you're not already captured by some agency. The internet is fake and gay, and that's becoming more clear. The age of natural rise to fames are over, if they ever existed.
Followed and see that Bethesda is in my catalogue more than I thought it was.
I'm surprised, and pleased, to see that Kingdom Come: Deliverance is on the list. So it does seem to be sticking to the Charlie Kirk context and nothing else (For the moment).
As long as the curator sticks to the lines they've drawn I'm happy to be subscribed to their recommendations. Don't need no intersectional bleed with other topics trying to shave the cream off this crop.
KCD2 is comically pozzed. It’s literally gay lol
That's why I was surprised. KCD1 was a hot topic when it released and was very well received by gamers. KCD2 decided to throw in all sorts of historically questionable content (Which clearly was enforced from those holding the purse strings) and so I thought they'd flipped to the side of ambition over reason.
So if they're a 'recommended' on the list, and the list is solely about 'not recommending' those celebrating Charlie Kirk's death so I guess they've at least held the line on that front.
I've not played KCD2 as I don't care for woke rewrites of history, but if KCD23 is about being a native Ghanaian and rounding up poor people from unarmed villages to sell them to the tribes on the shores of that continent for exploitation elsewhere I'll give it a look since it would be back to how things actually happened (As horrible as they might be).
Oh good, I was hoping someone had put something like this together.
The curation looks a bit haphazard though. For example they're recommending Tainted Grail because fuck Bethesda rather than verifying it as having any position at all on Charlie Kirk.
Maybe this will be like the Sweet Baby Inc stuff and we'll see a handful of groups emerge to track this stuff.
I wish he would list why some games are recommended and some aren't.
It's right there in the recommendation.
On KCD in the recomended list:
Really? It doesn't provide any evidence, and I can't find anything when I look for it either - other than Daniel Vavra attending a memorial for Kirk.
No, there's a handful of games where the description is left blank.
What a world where you have to wonder if a game-maker is supportive of murder and terrorism.