Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

49
Candace still running with the israel killed kirk theory (twitter.com)
posted 266 days ago by evilplushie 266 days ago by evilplushie +49 / -0
34 comments share
34 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
▲ 5 ▼
– TheOutlaw 5 points 266 days ago +5 / -0

Wasn't he just a millennial boomercon? I didn't follow him very closely but he never struck me as the type to deviate from the GOP's line on Israel.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Guy_Incognito76 8 points 266 days ago +8 / -0

I wasn't a kirk follower so this is all new to me.

Appears he was a standard Israel shill up until a few months ago he started to question things. It means he didn't realize his role as a sociopathic lying propagandist like other Israelis, he actually believed what they were telling them. So when he realized it was all lies, that made him mad.

Someone like that is actually a pretty big risk because you can't just write them off as a crank (as people in this thread are doing even now). The sense of betrayal drives them to a great level of resistance.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– multiformat 7 points 266 days ago +7 / -0

https://www.unz.com/article/who-killed-charlie-kirk-the-case-against-israel/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 5 points 266 days ago +5 / -0

He didn't, but fabulist stories about Israel threatening to kill him were circulating by Harrison Smith of Info Wars going back a couple of months ago. I suspect this stuff was circulated to boost Kirk's credibility among Israel critics, but it could have also just been engagement bait.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– CrazyPope 5 points 266 days ago +5 / -0

You know there's videos of Charlie talking online right? He absolutely was changing his mind, he wasn't a zioshill robot

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– evilplushie [S] 1 point 266 days ago +1 / -0

That….wasnt what he said?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CrazyPope 1 point 266 days ago +1 / -0

? Outlaw says he though was a normie boomercon, arch says he was and didn't change his mind and this is circulating to boost his credibility I say you can see videos of him talking proving he was changing his mind. I'm still half asleep, what am I missing?

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 2 points 266 days ago +2 / -0

Like him or not (and I was never a big fan for reasons unrelated to Israel), he had been opening his mind from the moment that the Iran War made the tide turn against Israel.

He invited Tucker Carlson. He had a debate on Israel between Dave Smith and a hack, which he moderated without putting his finger on the scale. He strongly opposed the Iran War (but of course had to cover for Trump in the end).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 2 points 266 days ago +2 / -0

Him platforming Carlson is a more realistic reason I could see Jews being pissed with him. Carlson has really made them mad lately.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– MLGS 5 points 266 days ago +5 / -0

Some people spend as much time obsessing over Israel as they do breathing, constantly looking for hidden code words and secret signals that prove the Mossad is behind every single thing that happens in the world. If there's the tiniest angle that might be a way to connect something to what they think Israel is, their mind latches on and won't let go no matter what.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 2 points 266 days ago +2 / -0

You're not completely wrong, but there is some small amount of circumstantial evidence. One is that Kirk had started becoming increasingly critical of Israel. Two, there were some comments from before the assassination claiming that Israel threatened to kill him. Three, how professionally this was done, and how the shooter got away - at least initially. That was the time when I wondered if it could be Israel.

Of course, this isn't very strong evidence. I'd say maybe 1-2% chance that Israel was involved.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MLGS 1 point 266 days ago +1 / -0

You can find circumstantial evidence for anything if you're looking for it. Going from "he said things that were critical of Israel recently" to "the Mossad plotted to murder Charlie Kirk" is totally insane behavior, absolutely no connection to reality whatsoever. A real Mossad hit looks like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Mahmoud_Al-Mabhouh, not a guy shooting a guy in broad daylight and then sending a Discord message to his gay roommate to make a 4 hour drive to pick up the gun.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 266 days ago +1 / -0

If you say with certainty that they did it, that is crazy.

On the other hand, are you saying that you are absolutely sure that they had no involvement? There is more circumstantial evidence than there is for Russher or Burkina Faso, don't you agree?

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy