You mean: actively supporting Hamas, or participating in the BDS movement which is a foreign policy of multiple Arab states in order to wage economic war on Israel.
Any guesses why the State Department doesn't want Americans participating an a foreign conflict that targets an ally?
At some point, you must realize that your inability to disentangle American foreign policy from Israel’s regional conflicts is, in itself, evidence of the problem, right? The fact that (in your eyes) no one can oppose Israel without automatically supporting Islam is a perfect illustration of why the founding fathers warned against permanent foreign alliances. In your mind, we must support Israel so long as they maintain a standard of behavior even one iota better than the Muslim savages surrounding them. How can you not see that this is a horrible dynamic enslaving America to an often times hostile foreign power? If we don’t have the ability to tell both parties to fuck off, then we don’t have political independence.
I've said that America should not only disentangle itself from Israel's conflicts a five dozen times over and you refuse to accept it every time. No statement from me repeating myself a dozen times over will change that. You make up shit in your head and demand I condemn the things that the Gizortnik in your head did.
The Arab nations in question can wage economic war with Israel all they want and so too should we be able to in the form of boycotting.
Any guesses why the State Department has unwavering support for a rogue state that’s perpetuating a genocide and works to continually stifle our relations with foreign governments by their regular bombing of other nations?
Internal propaganda has put a lot of effort into vilifying the last guy who subjected them to scrutiny, Joe McCarthy, which apparently goes a long way towards preventing others from looking at a department that's been infested with communists since the FDR administration.
If most every congresscreature had a handler from CAIR, I'd be pretty pissed about that. But it's a different group of unregistered foreign lobbyists that gets whatever they want from the alleged "people's house", so why wouldn't I oppose that corruption? I want both foreign influences out of the nation my ancestors built, but one is a significantly more competent threat than the other.
It's like you guys turboseethe about the jews and distract people from real issues, like your buddy fuentes, who conveniently tells people to vote for lefties and loves trannies.
"for opposing Israel's genocide"
You mean: actively supporting Hamas, or participating in the BDS movement which is a foreign policy of multiple Arab states in order to wage economic war on Israel.
Any guesses why the State Department doesn't want Americans participating an a foreign conflict that targets an ally?
Americans can boycott whatever they want and Israel can go kick rocks if they don't like it.
There's a difference between "I don't like Israel I won't buy Israeli products" and "I am participating in a foreign led economic warfare effort"
At some point, you must realize that your inability to disentangle American foreign policy from Israel’s regional conflicts is, in itself, evidence of the problem, right? The fact that (in your eyes) no one can oppose Israel without automatically supporting Islam is a perfect illustration of why the founding fathers warned against permanent foreign alliances. In your mind, we must support Israel so long as they maintain a standard of behavior even one iota better than the Muslim savages surrounding them. How can you not see that this is a horrible dynamic enslaving America to an often times hostile foreign power? If we don’t have the ability to tell both parties to fuck off, then we don’t have political independence.
I've said that America should not only disentangle itself from Israel's conflicts a five dozen times over and you refuse to accept it every time. No statement from me repeating myself a dozen times over will change that. You make up shit in your head and demand I condemn the things that the Gizortnik in your head did.
The Arab nations in question can wage economic war with Israel all they want and so too should we be able to in the form of boycotting.
Any guesses why the State Department has unwavering support for a rogue state that’s perpetuating a genocide and works to continually stifle our relations with foreign governments by their regular bombing of other nations?
I'll give you a hint: The State Department is another three-letter agency in action if not name. I still don't understand how they evade scrutiny.
Internal propaganda has put a lot of effort into vilifying the last guy who subjected them to scrutiny, Joe McCarthy, which apparently goes a long way towards preventing others from looking at a department that's been infested with communists since the FDR administration.
Don't forget that the State Department was founded by Fabian Socialists to take over international policy from the ambassador corps.
You can boycott Israel at any time for any reason.
Why are you choosing to affiliate your boycott with an economic warfare initiative led by Arab countries.
Fuck off jew
"only jews disagree with me"
You know, it's possible to oppose both groups of genocidal heathens. We don't have to pick a side.
And yet, you turbofags only ever seethe about the jews. Really telling.
If most every congresscreature had a handler from CAIR, I'd be pretty pissed about that. But it's a different group of unregistered foreign lobbyists that gets whatever they want from the alleged "people's house", so why wouldn't I oppose that corruption? I want both foreign influences out of the nation my ancestors built, but one is a significantly more competent threat than the other.
It's almost like people most complain about things that actually affect them, and disingenuous liars like yourself pretend that that isn't the case.
It's like you guys turboseethe about the jews and distract people from real issues, like your buddy fuentes, who conveniently tells people to vote for lefties and loves trannies.
It's like there's a pattern here.
Yeah, I've said that before. Now why are we supposed to pick the Arab one?
Why not just buy American? Who says you have to financially support one or the other?
You should by American anyway. You don't have to support either, that's my point.