I agree there is inference of her motive by Felix here, but it's indicative of a movement by liberal white European women going to brown and black places with political motivation to prove they are safer than those places reputation.
How can something whose motivation hasn't even been established be 'indicative' of anything?
Believe me, I'd love to laugh at people getting what they deserve. But I only do that when this was the actual motivation and not something made up to make a situation more inflammatory or turning it into "divine justice" - like with people taking in 'refugees', for which there is 0 excuse. Going on safari is pretty ordinary here, somewhat strange as it is to me as a colored.
Well for starters it wasn't an official safari, she was on an unofficial tour with an unofficial tour guide, whose been charged.
Secondly, other women have done bike trips, or hikes in places with dangerous places to show a lack of danger. It doesn't mean those people weren't actually biking or hiking or whatever.
Well for starters it wasn't an official safari, she was on an unofficial tour with an unofficial tour guide, whose been charged.
The charge seems to be not operating with a license. So your theory is that she could have gone with a licensed tour operator, but that she knowingly went with one who wasn't "to prove that she wasn't racist"?
Secondly, other women have done bike trips, or hikes in places with dangerous places to show a lack of danger
I know people claimed that afterwards. But if this was their actual motivation.
I don't have a motivation at all. I don't know anything about her case. I said the commenter is making an assumption.
Other people have claimed to take dangerous routes, or gone to dangerous places for stated reasons akin to showing dangerous areas are safer than advertised.
If the plan is unnecessarily going off the beaten path to prove a political point, then announce this on social media it's not assumed.
Other people have claimed to take dangerous routes, or gone to dangerous places for stated reasons akin to showing dangerous areas are safer than advertised.
Not quite. Or you have seen different things than I have. Are you sure that this wasn't people claiming this after their deaths? The right has this problem of believing anything posted by anons on social media.
If the plan is unnecessarily going off the beaten path to prove a political point, then announce this on social media it's not assumed.
If. But I would be very surprised if it had anything to do with a 'poltiical point'.
How can something whose motivation hasn't even been established be 'indicative' of anything?
Believe me, I'd love to laugh at people getting what they deserve. But I only do that when this was the actual motivation and not something made up to make a situation more inflammatory or turning it into "divine justice" - like with people taking in 'refugees', for which there is 0 excuse. Going on safari is pretty ordinary here, somewhat strange as it is to me as a colored.
Well for starters it wasn't an official safari, she was on an unofficial tour with an unofficial tour guide, whose been charged.
Secondly, other women have done bike trips, or hikes in places with dangerous places to show a lack of danger. It doesn't mean those people weren't actually biking or hiking or whatever.
The charge seems to be not operating with a license. So your theory is that she could have gone with a licensed tour operator, but that she knowingly went with one who wasn't "to prove that she wasn't racist"?
I know people claimed that afterwards. But if this was their actual motivation.
I don't have a motivation at all. I don't know anything about her case. I said the commenter is making an assumption.
Other people have claimed to take dangerous routes, or gone to dangerous places for stated reasons akin to showing dangerous areas are safer than advertised.
If the plan is unnecessarily going off the beaten path to prove a political point, then announce this on social media it's not assumed.
Not quite. Or you have seen different things than I have. Are you sure that this wasn't people claiming this after their deaths? The right has this problem of believing anything posted by anons on social media.
If. But I would be very surprised if it had anything to do with a 'poltiical point'.
The unofficial tour guide has been charged exactly with that, with operating as a tour guide without a license, and nothing else.