Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

121
It’s a mystery! (twitter.com)
posted 284 days ago by Ahaus667 284 days ago by Ahaus667 +121 / -0
44 comments share
44 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 3 points 283 days ago +3 / -0

Well for starters it wasn't an official safari, she was on an unofficial tour with an unofficial tour guide, whose been charged.

The charge seems to be not operating with a license. So your theory is that she could have gone with a licensed tour operator, but that she knowingly went with one who wasn't "to prove that she wasn't racist"?

Secondly, other women have done bike trips, or hikes in places with dangerous places to show a lack of danger

I know people claimed that afterwards. But if this was their actual motivation.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Mpetey123 2 points 283 days ago +2 / -0

I don't have a motivation at all. I don't know anything about her case. I said the commenter is making an assumption.

Other people have claimed to take dangerous routes, or gone to dangerous places for stated reasons akin to showing dangerous areas are safer than advertised.

If the plan is unnecessarily going off the beaten path to prove a political point, then announce this on social media it's not assumed.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 2 points 283 days ago +2 / -0

Other people have claimed to take dangerous routes, or gone to dangerous places for stated reasons akin to showing dangerous areas are safer than advertised.

Not quite. Or you have seen different things than I have. Are you sure that this wasn't people claiming this after their deaths? The right has this problem of believing anything posted by anons on social media.

If the plan is unnecessarily going off the beaten path to prove a political point, then announce this on social media it's not assumed.

If. But I would be very surprised if it had anything to do with a 'poltiical point'.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Mpetey123 1 point 283 days ago +1 / -0

I suppose they wouldn't call it a political point, but a mission of humanitarians or something. But I'd call those political.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 2 points 283 days ago +2 / -0

I would too. I suspect it's got nothing to do with that either though. These are just people out for adventure, also a modern pathology.

Hell, I concede that you might even be able to find them saying "it's not as unsafe as they claim". I've been to (way safer) places that my very safety-conscious family criticized for me, and my response was: it's not as unsafe as you think. That is me covering my ---. Not trying to prove a point. So to assert that the whole motivation was "to prove that it's not unsafe" is a bit much.

People are selfish and self-interested (even if that is a thrill for novelty). They don't put their own lives at risk to prove some sort of weird point. They may dress up their self-interest as humanitarianism or defend it, but that's very different from that being the actual reason.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy