How do they plan to adjudicate conflicts between roman law and sharia? For example, in calling witnesses according to sex (illegal to discriminate currently) or holding contracts as binding (sharia allows contracts to non-muslims to be dissolved at will...) ?
The whole concept is that this is a legal arbitration. Meaning that they are not actually going through the court process. If both parties agree to this form of arbitration, then that's how the contract dispute is settled.
The fact that this Shirai option exists at all is a death knell to justice in Australia. Dammit! Austria!
Missed it by that much! (holds fingers an inch apart)
How do they plan to adjudicate conflicts between roman law and sharia? For example, in calling witnesses according to sex (illegal to discriminate currently) or holding contracts as binding (sharia allows contracts to non-muslims to be dissolved at will...) ?
Both parties need to agree to attending one court
What if they don't agree?
If?
Then they would have to go to normal court.
The whole concept is that this is a legal arbitration. Meaning that they are not actually going through the court process. If both parties agree to this form of arbitration, then that's how the contract dispute is settled.
💥💩💥
Then it goes to a normal court.
The fact that this Shirai option exists at all is a death knell to justice in
Australia.Dammit! Austria!Missed it by that much! (holds fingers an inch apart)
Austria not Australia, we'll be officialising our sharia courts next year.