How does Deuteronomy 28 not completely refute all of Zionism?
(www.bible.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (72)
sorted by:
Oh I know this one! The people who murdered Him, believe that He is boiling in shit in hell, and hold to an identity rooted in their hatred and rejection of Him!
(Yeah, I'm a dispensationalist, how could you tell?)
The slack jaw, vacent eyes, drool and being my in laws gave it away.
Hi Mildred. You are about the 15th person to allude to the most misquoted text anywhere on Scored.
That reads like a bunch nonsence to try to get around the fact it says Jesus is boiling in excrement.
Depends on your definition on "Jesus", "is", "boiling", "in", and "excrement". Other than that, perfectly clear.
Or, you could actually, you know, learn. It wouldn't kill you, I promise.
I did read it. "When they said Jesus, they didn't mean Jesus Jesus" Yeah they did. When they say Titus, they mean Titus. They hate Titus because he destroyed the physical temple. When they say Jesus, they mean Jesus because He destroyed their spiritual temple.
Also, funny wordplay: When we say "Gas the Jews" there is multiple, subtle layers humorously interplaying there.
"Gas" could refer to not just the de-lousing agents, it also calls to mind flatulence, which is often offensive to everyone else around but not to the one who actually caused it. Just like jewery is repulsive to everyone else in society except the jews that commit it.
Also, by "Jews" we don't necessarily mean the demonic religion that wears ancient Hebrew spirituality as a skinsuit to cover their abhorrent behavior... because then we wouldn't have capitalized it.
Funny how there's supposedly many candidates for who that Leviticus-ignoring(10:31) rabbi was speaking with, yet apologists for the Christ-haters never name them.
In my Talmud quotes compilation, I do name the primary two other candidates who contributed to the stock figure "Yeshu" besides Yehoshua of Nazareth. They are Yeshu the Student who served the rabbi ben Perachiah (a rabbi who is yet another Yehoshua) in the early 1st century BC, and Yeshu son of Pappos who was present during the bar Kochba rebellion in the 130s AD. Simple historical inquiry indicates that these were three different people nicknamed Yeshu who fell into disfavor with much of Jewry and so any reference to Yeshu alone is generally an amalgamation of those. In the whole Talmud, besides generic narratives, there is basically one narrative each where a figure can be historically placed, and the narrative for Yehoshua of Nazareth is pretty accurate (he was killed on Passover for stirring up the people, his disciples like Mattai continued teaching his words and were killed for it).
After years of seeing all kinds of things said here about the Talmud, I looked for myself and found the historically accurate parts are pretty easily separated from the exaggerations.
Your reference to ignorance of whatever would be "Lev. 10:31" (you might mean Deut. 18:10-11) seems to mean that Onkelos was not Levitically pure. That's part of the humor of the intended joke, it starts with a taboo before it gets worse and develops its punchline (about how Israel is beloved even in hell). This is spoken of Onkelos when he was a Gentile thinking of conversion, and he never became a rabbi (though he was a translator whose textual work is still used by Christians and Jews). So the point is that even with Onkelos being in total ignorance, he yet received a (humorous) confirmation of the rightness of following Moses, from Yeshu himself, whichever dishonorable Yeshu or Yeshus the author intended.
You may be interested in extended discussion about how Onkelos, being a Gentile convert, is actually my best historical candidate for who Jesus meant by the synagogue of satan. He had fingers in many pies.
This is your brain on zionism
Fuck off kike, we have seen through your talmudic tricks ages ago.