supported the Iraq War and even claim there were WMD there
Because there were. When Bush said it, Saddam hadn't sent them to Syria yet. The UN said there were even after the war was over.
550 tons of yellowcake wasn't found in a bakery, ok? It is the starting block for nuclear weapons. That's a part of a WMD PROGRAM which was banned by the treaty.
You also are mistaking "the sizzle" for the "steak" ok? You believe the selling points are important, they are not, they're just there to dazzle your eyes. The fact is: Saddam violated the Cease Fire treaty & thus it was legally "war on!" for everyone involved. That takes too much thinking though, so a buzzphrase was made. Do not mistake the map (sizzle, slogan) for the terrain (steak, reality), ok?
PFFT! How can other nations "violate the treat" but Iran didn't? Mental gymnastics! You should go to the Progressive Olympics! 😸
No, after 10 years (or whatever the number was, the X means unknown, like in maths, duh!) they would be free to say "No thanks!" and openly pursue nuclear weapons with NO restrictions. Like Pakistan and India did.
No, after 10 years (or whatever the number was, the X means unknown, like in maths, duh!) they would be free to say "No thanks!" and openly pursue nuclear weapons with NO restrictions.
They can already do that now, dumbass. And I think they will. They'll be right to, because it's the only way to avoid being bombed by the US and Israel.
But thanks for trying!
If you want to act smug, you should at least not fail so miserably.
Just ignore the findings of the UN? Of every intelligence agency anywhere? Go for it! YOU know better than people who actually found the proof.
So Iran allegedly followed ONE part of the deal? And that means they also followed ALL of the deal too? Like not testing mid- or long ranged missiles like they did a few weeks after signing it?
You failed to explain how other nations can violate it, but Iran didn't.
You failed to even look at the agreement, which forbade enrichment at Fordo for 15 years, lasting until 2030. Clearly that was violated, Iran bragged about it.
Branch of math? Like on a tree? Do you think I'm speaking Latin here? X means 10? Do I look Roman to you? Are you so unfamiliar with math that you don't know what X stands for? Retard.
Did you even look up the agreement? No! Because it hasn't ended yet, it covers various things for 10 to 15 years from 2016.
Now try actually addressing the issue. You're so predictable and boring, fyi.
The non-existent findings you couldn't produce last time you made the same preposterous claims? Those ones?
So Iran allegedly followed ONE part of the deal? And that means they also followed ALL of the deal too? Like not testing mid- or long ranged missiles like they did a few weeks after signing it?
So Iran violated a "part of the deal" that wasn't part of the deal?
You're thoroughly retarded.
You failed to explain how other nations can violate it, but Iran didn't.
I "failed" to explain something that I didn't intend to explain. Do try to keep up, slow boy.
You failed to even look at the agreement, which forbade enrichment at Fordo for 15 years, lasting until 2030. Clearly that was violated, Iran bragged about it.
So you're not completely clueless about the agreement. You managed to flag something that's actually in it. Yet you failed to prove that it was "violated" and that Iran "bragged" it.
Don't tell me that you're stupid enough to actually contend that Iran "violated" anything after Trump pulled out. There's no way even you could fail to understand that all sides are supposed to uphold an agreement, but if you don't, that is a great microcosm for why your corrupt, puppet, shithole non-country is being pulverized at the moment.
Branch of math? Like on a tree? Do you think I'm speaking Latin here? X means 10? Do I look Roman to you? Are you so unfamiliar with math that you don't know what X stands for? Retard.
No, there is no way you know Latin, or any language other than English. You're not bright, after all. And yes, mathematics has branches. No branch of mathematics, to my knowledge, uses X as a symbol for 'unknown'. So your "duh" was a bright island of ultra-stupidity in your usual mega-stupidity. Quite an achievement, for which you deserve credit.
Because it hasn't ended yet
Wow. You really are stupid beyond my comprehension. A literal crazy person who thinks that others are obliged to continue an agreement when you violate it and pull out. Guess what, I'm going to sell my house, collect the money - and then pull out of the agreement. If you don't give me the money, you are violating the agreement.
Is it any wonder that fake Ukraine is a MESS, when there are 30 million you's running around?
You're so predictable and boring, fyi.
So you could see the whipping that you got coming, and still you persisted in your stupid? I guess you really can't help it.
Pedantic little twit.
Not one answer, not one intelligent thing to say.
I know you're not a 'bot though 😆 since no one would build a 'bot as stupid as you are!
So Iran violated a "part of the deal" that wasn't part of the deal?
I looked, it IS in the agreement, it was even reported as a violation at the time. You do not know what is in the deal or not, this proves it. So now prove that it isn't in the deal, that the reporting of it was false. It's even in the Wiki! Or stfu already.
that I didn't intend to explain
So you admit to trolling? Or that you simply say shit that you cannot explain. Or both! Nice of you to admit it.
Why can you refuse to explain something, but when I DO explain something I also have to provide links like this is a PHD paper? Hypocrite much?
No branch of mathematics, to my knowledge, uses X as a symbol for 'unknown'.
Have some knowledge it isn't "in a branch" it is in ALL math! Universal! I learned this in grade 4 & used it up to university calc.
I just proved you wrong, again, and your reply will be positive, right? Admitting this? Yes? 😹
Because there were. When Bush said it, Saddam hadn't sent them to Syria yet. The UN said there were even after the war was over.
550 tons of yellowcake wasn't found in a bakery, ok? It is the starting block for nuclear weapons. That's a part of a WMD PROGRAM which was banned by the treaty.
You also are mistaking "the sizzle" for the "steak" ok? You believe the selling points are important, they are not, they're just there to dazzle your eyes. The fact is: Saddam violated the Cease Fire treaty & thus it was legally "war on!" for everyone involved. That takes too much thinking though, so a buzzphrase was made. Do not mistake the map (sizzle, slogan) for the terrain (steak, reality), ok?
PFFT! How can other nations "violate the treat" but Iran didn't? Mental gymnastics! You should go to the Progressive Olympics! 😸
No, after 10 years (or whatever the number was, the X means unknown, like in maths, duh!) they would be free to say "No thanks!" and openly pursue nuclear weapons with NO restrictions. Like Pakistan and India did.
But thanks for trying!
lol. I'm really glad you keep quadrupling down on that, because it shows how seriously you should be taken.
Let me explain to you. Iran did abide by its obligations under the treaty, and Europe and America didn't.
What branch of mathematics is that?
They can already do that now, dumbass. And I think they will. They'll be right to, because it's the only way to avoid being bombed by the US and Israel.
If you want to act smug, you should at least not fail so miserably.
Wow, you are a pedantic little cunt, eh?
Just ignore the findings of the UN? Of every intelligence agency anywhere? Go for it! YOU know better than people who actually found the proof.
So Iran allegedly followed ONE part of the deal? And that means they also followed ALL of the deal too? Like not testing mid- or long ranged missiles like they did a few weeks after signing it?
You failed to explain how other nations can violate it, but Iran didn't.
You failed to even look at the agreement, which forbade enrichment at Fordo for 15 years, lasting until 2030. Clearly that was violated, Iran bragged about it.
Branch of math? Like on a tree? Do you think I'm speaking Latin here? X means 10? Do I look Roman to you? Are you so unfamiliar with math that you don't know what X stands for? Retard.
Did you even look up the agreement? No! Because it hasn't ended yet, it covers various things for 10 to 15 years from 2016.
Now try actually addressing the issue. You're so predictable and boring, fyi.
The non-existent findings you couldn't produce last time you made the same preposterous claims? Those ones?
So Iran violated a "part of the deal" that wasn't part of the deal?
You're thoroughly retarded.
I "failed" to explain something that I didn't intend to explain. Do try to keep up, slow boy.
So you're not completely clueless about the agreement. You managed to flag something that's actually in it. Yet you failed to prove that it was "violated" and that Iran "bragged" it.
Don't tell me that you're stupid enough to actually contend that Iran "violated" anything after Trump pulled out. There's no way even you could fail to understand that all sides are supposed to uphold an agreement, but if you don't, that is a great microcosm for why your corrupt, puppet, shithole non-country is being pulverized at the moment.
No, there is no way you know Latin, or any language other than English. You're not bright, after all. And yes, mathematics has branches. No branch of mathematics, to my knowledge, uses X as a symbol for 'unknown'. So your "duh" was a bright island of ultra-stupidity in your usual mega-stupidity. Quite an achievement, for which you deserve credit.
Wow. You really are stupid beyond my comprehension. A literal crazy person who thinks that others are obliged to continue an agreement when you violate it and pull out. Guess what, I'm going to sell my house, collect the money - and then pull out of the agreement. If you don't give me the money, you are violating the agreement.
Is it any wonder that fake Ukraine is a MESS, when there are 30 million you's running around?
So you could see the whipping that you got coming, and still you persisted in your stupid? I guess you really can't help it.
Pedantic little twit.
Not one answer, not one intelligent thing to say.
I know you're not a 'bot though 😆 since no one would build a 'bot as stupid as you are!
I looked, it IS in the agreement, it was even reported as a violation at the time. You do not know what is in the deal or not, this proves it. So now prove that it isn't in the deal, that the reporting of it was false. It's even in the Wiki! Or stfu already.
So you admit to trolling? Or that you simply say shit that you cannot explain. Or both! Nice of you to admit it.
Why can you refuse to explain something, but when I DO explain something I also have to provide links like this is a PHD paper? Hypocrite much?
Have some knowledge it isn't "in a branch" it is in ALL math! Universal! I learned this in grade 4 & used it up to university calc.
I just proved you wrong, again, and your reply will be positive, right? Admitting this? Yes? 😹