Pedantic little twit.
Not one answer, not one intelligent thing to say.
I know you're not a 'bot though 😆 since no one would build a 'bot as stupid as you are!
So Iran violated a "part of the deal" that wasn't part of the deal?
I looked, it IS in the agreement, it was even reported as a violation at the time. You do not know what is in the deal or not, this proves it. So now prove that it isn't in the deal, that the reporting of it was false. It's even in the Wiki! Or stfu already.
that I didn't intend to explain
So you admit to trolling? Or that you simply say shit that you cannot explain. Or both! Nice of you to admit it.
Why can you refuse to explain something, but when I DO explain something I also have to provide links like this is a PHD paper? Hypocrite much?
No branch of mathematics, to my knowledge, uses X as a symbol for 'unknown'.
Have some knowledge it isn't "in a branch" it is in ALL math! Universal! I learned this in grade 4 & used it up to university calc.
I just proved you wrong, again, and your reply will be positive, right? Admitting this? Yes? 😹
Not one answer indeed. Once again, you made wild claims you completely failed to back up, like your usual "the UN found WMD in Iraq". You couldn't defend your utterly embarrassing claim that it's "violating" an agreement to not follow it when the other side has pulled out.
I looked, it IS in the agreement, it was even reported as a violation at the time. You do not know what is in the deal or not, this proves it. So now prove that it isn't in the deal, that the reporting of it was false. It's even in the Wiki! Or stfu already.
Wiki? No doubt that is where you saw it, if you saw it at all. I looked at the actual agreement, and there was no such mention of missiles. So now you're going to put up or shut up.
I'm actually rooting for you, this would be the first time that you managed to provide evidence for one of your claims. But you're probably just lying, as your ilk is like to do.
Or that you simply say shit that you cannot explain.
Who said "cannot"? I had forgotten that I'm talking to someone with the intelligence and temperament of a child. Some things speak for themselves.
I also have to provide links like this is a PHD paper?
Wow yeah, totally. The only place where people provide links to what they're claiming is is in a Ph.D. (= Philosophiae Doctor, the H is not capitalized, genius - I did say you don't speak Latin) "paper"?
Have some knowledge it isn't "in a branch" it is in ALL math! Universal! I learned this in grade 4 & used it up to university calc.
Dear god. That's lowercase 'x', you retard extraordinaire. Duh. And even that is not a symbol for 'unknown', just a variable.
I just proved you wrong, again, and your reply will be positive, right? Admitting this? Yes? 😹
You're the king of the world in your own fantasy. In real life, you're a clown, like your "president" Zelensky.
Utterly predictable! What a whiny little bitch you are.
this would be the first time that you managed to provide evidence for one of your claims.
Except for the maths is fun proof? Except for all the other times I've been proven right, aside from those eh?
And even that is not a symbol for 'unknown', just a variable.
"It is called a "variable" or sometimes an "unknown"."
So wrong again! The link wasn't that long, you didn't even read it all? Or are just too retarded to retain information for more than a few seconds? I'm betting: BOTH! 🤡
like your "president" Zelensky.
& he accuses ME of living in a fantasy world? Your Medallion of ESP is broken dude, try logic & reasoning for a change, eh? 😋 NAH! Never happen.
Utterly predictable! What a whiny little bitch you are.
You're getting owned by a whiny little bitch? So much the worse for you.
Except for the maths is fun proof? Except for all the other times I've been proven right, aside from those eh?
Except for the case where you capitalized X, and then linked as proof a source that didn't. So ironically, the one time you provided a link, you played yourself.
Then again, fake Ukraine is good at playing itself.
"It is called a "variable" or sometimes an "unknown"."
Yes, this is talking about LOWERCASE x, and even there you fail. I've never seen it called an 'unknown' (noun), let alone unknown (adjective) as you called it.
So wrong again! The link wasn't that long, you didn't even read it all?
I even read the last paragraph, though admittedly only now. How absolutely embarrassing for you.
& he accuses ME of living in a fantasy world? Your Medallion of ESP is broken dude,
You've admitted it. Frankly, once you said that you lived in Canada, I guessed it - because there is only one community that's as loony as you are.
It's noted that you forfeited (1) your preposterous claims that the UN said there were WMDs in Iraq and (2) your absurd claim about the JCPOA banning ballistic missile tests, and Iran then violating said provision.
Pedantic little twit.
Not one answer, not one intelligent thing to say.
I know you're not a 'bot though 😆 since no one would build a 'bot as stupid as you are!
I looked, it IS in the agreement, it was even reported as a violation at the time. You do not know what is in the deal or not, this proves it. So now prove that it isn't in the deal, that the reporting of it was false. It's even in the Wiki! Or stfu already.
So you admit to trolling? Or that you simply say shit that you cannot explain. Or both! Nice of you to admit it.
Why can you refuse to explain something, but when I DO explain something I also have to provide links like this is a PHD paper? Hypocrite much?
Have some knowledge it isn't "in a branch" it is in ALL math! Universal! I learned this in grade 4 & used it up to university calc.
I just proved you wrong, again, and your reply will be positive, right? Admitting this? Yes? 😹
Not one answer indeed. Once again, you made wild claims you completely failed to back up, like your usual "the UN found WMD in Iraq". You couldn't defend your utterly embarrassing claim that it's "violating" an agreement to not follow it when the other side has pulled out.
Wiki? No doubt that is where you saw it, if you saw it at all. I looked at the actual agreement, and there was no such mention of missiles. So now you're going to put up or shut up.
I'm actually rooting for you, this would be the first time that you managed to provide evidence for one of your claims. But you're probably just lying, as your ilk is like to do.
Who said "cannot"? I had forgotten that I'm talking to someone with the intelligence and temperament of a child. Some things speak for themselves.
Wow yeah, totally. The only place where people provide links to what they're claiming is is in a Ph.D. (= Philosophiae Doctor, the H is not capitalized, genius - I did say you don't speak Latin) "paper"?
Dear god. That's lowercase 'x', you retard extraordinaire. Duh. And even that is not a symbol for 'unknown', just a variable.
You're the king of the world in your own fantasy. In real life, you're a clown, like your "president" Zelensky.
Utterly predictable! What a whiny little bitch you are.
Except for the maths is fun proof? Except for all the other times I've been proven right, aside from those eh?
"It is called a "variable" or sometimes an "unknown"."
So wrong again! The link wasn't that long, you didn't even read it all? Or are just too retarded to retain information for more than a few seconds? I'm betting: BOTH! 🤡
& he accuses ME of living in a fantasy world? Your Medallion of ESP is broken dude, try logic & reasoning for a change, eh? 😋 NAH! Never happen.
You're getting owned by a whiny little bitch? So much the worse for you.
Except for the case where you capitalized X, and then linked as proof a source that didn't. So ironically, the one time you provided a link, you played yourself.
Then again, fake Ukraine is good at playing itself.
Yes, this is talking about LOWERCASE x, and even there you fail. I've never seen it called an 'unknown' (noun), let alone unknown (adjective) as you called it.
I even read the last paragraph, though admittedly only now. How absolutely embarrassing for you.
You've admitted it. Frankly, once you said that you lived in Canada, I guessed it - because there is only one community that's as loony as you are.
It's noted that you forfeited (1) your preposterous claims that the UN said there were WMDs in Iraq and (2) your absurd claim about the JCPOA banning ballistic missile tests, and Iran then violating said provision.
Man, you guys are champion losers, aren't you?