Just ignore the findings of the UN? Of every intelligence agency anywhere? Go for it! YOU know better than people who actually found the proof.
So Iran allegedly followed ONE part of the deal? And that means they also followed ALL of the deal too? Like not testing mid- or long ranged missiles like they did a few weeks after signing it?
You failed to explain how other nations can violate it, but Iran didn't.
You failed to even look at the agreement, which forbade enrichment at Fordo for 15 years, lasting until 2030. Clearly that was violated, Iran bragged about it.
Branch of math? Like on a tree? Do you think I'm speaking Latin here? X means 10? Do I look Roman to you? Are you so unfamiliar with math that you don't know what X stands for? Retard.
Did you even look up the agreement? No! Because it hasn't ended yet, it covers various things for 10 to 15 years from 2016.
Now try actually addressing the issue. You're so predictable and boring, fyi.
The non-existent findings you couldn't produce last time you made the same preposterous claims? Those ones?
So Iran allegedly followed ONE part of the deal? And that means they also followed ALL of the deal too? Like not testing mid- or long ranged missiles like they did a few weeks after signing it?
So Iran violated a "part of the deal" that wasn't part of the deal?
You're thoroughly retarded.
You failed to explain how other nations can violate it, but Iran didn't.
I "failed" to explain something that I didn't intend to explain. Do try to keep up, slow boy.
You failed to even look at the agreement, which forbade enrichment at Fordo for 15 years, lasting until 2030. Clearly that was violated, Iran bragged about it.
So you're not completely clueless about the agreement. You managed to flag something that's actually in it. Yet you failed to prove that it was "violated" and that Iran "bragged" it.
Don't tell me that you're stupid enough to actually contend that Iran "violated" anything after Trump pulled out. There's no way even you could fail to understand that all sides are supposed to uphold an agreement, but if you don't, that is a great microcosm for why your corrupt, puppet, shithole non-country is being pulverized at the moment.
Branch of math? Like on a tree? Do you think I'm speaking Latin here? X means 10? Do I look Roman to you? Are you so unfamiliar with math that you don't know what X stands for? Retard.
No, there is no way you know Latin, or any language other than English. You're not bright, after all. And yes, mathematics has branches. No branch of mathematics, to my knowledge, uses X as a symbol for 'unknown'. So your "duh" was a bright island of ultra-stupidity in your usual mega-stupidity. Quite an achievement, for which you deserve credit.
Because it hasn't ended yet
Wow. You really are stupid beyond my comprehension. A literal crazy person who thinks that others are obliged to continue an agreement when you violate it and pull out. Guess what, I'm going to sell my house, collect the money - and then pull out of the agreement. If you don't give me the money, you are violating the agreement.
Is it any wonder that fake Ukraine is a MESS, when there are 30 million you's running around?
You're so predictable and boring, fyi.
So you could see the whipping that you got coming, and still you persisted in your stupid? I guess you really can't help it.
Pedantic little twit.
Not one answer, not one intelligent thing to say.
I know you're not a 'bot though 😆 since no one would build a 'bot as stupid as you are!
So Iran violated a "part of the deal" that wasn't part of the deal?
I looked, it IS in the agreement, it was even reported as a violation at the time. You do not know what is in the deal or not, this proves it. So now prove that it isn't in the deal, that the reporting of it was false. It's even in the Wiki! Or stfu already.
that I didn't intend to explain
So you admit to trolling? Or that you simply say shit that you cannot explain. Or both! Nice of you to admit it.
Why can you refuse to explain something, but when I DO explain something I also have to provide links like this is a PHD paper? Hypocrite much?
No branch of mathematics, to my knowledge, uses X as a symbol for 'unknown'.
Have some knowledge it isn't "in a branch" it is in ALL math! Universal! I learned this in grade 4 & used it up to university calc.
I just proved you wrong, again, and your reply will be positive, right? Admitting this? Yes? 😹
Not one answer indeed. Once again, you made wild claims you completely failed to back up, like your usual "the UN found WMD in Iraq". You couldn't defend your utterly embarrassing claim that it's "violating" an agreement to not follow it when the other side has pulled out.
I looked, it IS in the agreement, it was even reported as a violation at the time. You do not know what is in the deal or not, this proves it. So now prove that it isn't in the deal, that the reporting of it was false. It's even in the Wiki! Or stfu already.
Wiki? No doubt that is where you saw it, if you saw it at all. I looked at the actual agreement, and there was no such mention of missiles. So now you're going to put up or shut up.
I'm actually rooting for you, this would be the first time that you managed to provide evidence for one of your claims. But you're probably just lying, as your ilk is like to do.
Or that you simply say shit that you cannot explain.
Who said "cannot"? I had forgotten that I'm talking to someone with the intelligence and temperament of a child. Some things speak for themselves.
I also have to provide links like this is a PHD paper?
Wow yeah, totally. The only place where people provide links to what they're claiming is is in a Ph.D. (= Philosophiae Doctor, the H is not capitalized, genius - I did say you don't speak Latin) "paper"?
Have some knowledge it isn't "in a branch" it is in ALL math! Universal! I learned this in grade 4 & used it up to university calc.
Dear god. That's lowercase 'x', you retard extraordinaire. Duh. And even that is not a symbol for 'unknown', just a variable.
I just proved you wrong, again, and your reply will be positive, right? Admitting this? Yes? 😹
You're the king of the world in your own fantasy. In real life, you're a clown, like your "president" Zelensky.
Utterly predictable! What a whiny little bitch you are.
this would be the first time that you managed to provide evidence for one of your claims.
Except for the maths is fun proof? Except for all the other times I've been proven right, aside from those eh?
And even that is not a symbol for 'unknown', just a variable.
"It is called a "variable" or sometimes an "unknown"."
So wrong again! The link wasn't that long, you didn't even read it all? Or are just too retarded to retain information for more than a few seconds? I'm betting: BOTH! 🤡
like your "president" Zelensky.
& he accuses ME of living in a fantasy world? Your Medallion of ESP is broken dude, try logic & reasoning for a change, eh? 😋 NAH! Never happen.
Wow, you are a pedantic little cunt, eh?
Just ignore the findings of the UN? Of every intelligence agency anywhere? Go for it! YOU know better than people who actually found the proof.
So Iran allegedly followed ONE part of the deal? And that means they also followed ALL of the deal too? Like not testing mid- or long ranged missiles like they did a few weeks after signing it?
You failed to explain how other nations can violate it, but Iran didn't.
You failed to even look at the agreement, which forbade enrichment at Fordo for 15 years, lasting until 2030. Clearly that was violated, Iran bragged about it.
Branch of math? Like on a tree? Do you think I'm speaking Latin here? X means 10? Do I look Roman to you? Are you so unfamiliar with math that you don't know what X stands for? Retard.
Did you even look up the agreement? No! Because it hasn't ended yet, it covers various things for 10 to 15 years from 2016.
Now try actually addressing the issue. You're so predictable and boring, fyi.
The non-existent findings you couldn't produce last time you made the same preposterous claims? Those ones?
So Iran violated a "part of the deal" that wasn't part of the deal?
You're thoroughly retarded.
I "failed" to explain something that I didn't intend to explain. Do try to keep up, slow boy.
So you're not completely clueless about the agreement. You managed to flag something that's actually in it. Yet you failed to prove that it was "violated" and that Iran "bragged" it.
Don't tell me that you're stupid enough to actually contend that Iran "violated" anything after Trump pulled out. There's no way even you could fail to understand that all sides are supposed to uphold an agreement, but if you don't, that is a great microcosm for why your corrupt, puppet, shithole non-country is being pulverized at the moment.
No, there is no way you know Latin, or any language other than English. You're not bright, after all. And yes, mathematics has branches. No branch of mathematics, to my knowledge, uses X as a symbol for 'unknown'. So your "duh" was a bright island of ultra-stupidity in your usual mega-stupidity. Quite an achievement, for which you deserve credit.
Wow. You really are stupid beyond my comprehension. A literal crazy person who thinks that others are obliged to continue an agreement when you violate it and pull out. Guess what, I'm going to sell my house, collect the money - and then pull out of the agreement. If you don't give me the money, you are violating the agreement.
Is it any wonder that fake Ukraine is a MESS, when there are 30 million you's running around?
So you could see the whipping that you got coming, and still you persisted in your stupid? I guess you really can't help it.
Pedantic little twit.
Not one answer, not one intelligent thing to say.
I know you're not a 'bot though 😆 since no one would build a 'bot as stupid as you are!
I looked, it IS in the agreement, it was even reported as a violation at the time. You do not know what is in the deal or not, this proves it. So now prove that it isn't in the deal, that the reporting of it was false. It's even in the Wiki! Or stfu already.
So you admit to trolling? Or that you simply say shit that you cannot explain. Or both! Nice of you to admit it.
Why can you refuse to explain something, but when I DO explain something I also have to provide links like this is a PHD paper? Hypocrite much?
Have some knowledge it isn't "in a branch" it is in ALL math! Universal! I learned this in grade 4 & used it up to university calc.
I just proved you wrong, again, and your reply will be positive, right? Admitting this? Yes? 😹
Not one answer indeed. Once again, you made wild claims you completely failed to back up, like your usual "the UN found WMD in Iraq". You couldn't defend your utterly embarrassing claim that it's "violating" an agreement to not follow it when the other side has pulled out.
Wiki? No doubt that is where you saw it, if you saw it at all. I looked at the actual agreement, and there was no such mention of missiles. So now you're going to put up or shut up.
I'm actually rooting for you, this would be the first time that you managed to provide evidence for one of your claims. But you're probably just lying, as your ilk is like to do.
Who said "cannot"? I had forgotten that I'm talking to someone with the intelligence and temperament of a child. Some things speak for themselves.
Wow yeah, totally. The only place where people provide links to what they're claiming is is in a Ph.D. (= Philosophiae Doctor, the H is not capitalized, genius - I did say you don't speak Latin) "paper"?
Dear god. That's lowercase 'x', you retard extraordinaire. Duh. And even that is not a symbol for 'unknown', just a variable.
You're the king of the world in your own fantasy. In real life, you're a clown, like your "president" Zelensky.
Utterly predictable! What a whiny little bitch you are.
Except for the maths is fun proof? Except for all the other times I've been proven right, aside from those eh?
"It is called a "variable" or sometimes an "unknown"."
So wrong again! The link wasn't that long, you didn't even read it all? Or are just too retarded to retain information for more than a few seconds? I'm betting: BOTH! 🤡
& he accuses ME of living in a fantasy world? Your Medallion of ESP is broken dude, try logic & reasoning for a change, eh? 😋 NAH! Never happen.