The chicks over in China have already figured out the way around this.
Under the new guideline, assets acquired solely under the husband’s name-such as a house bought before marriage-can remain his after divorce, unless formal co-ownership was established.
They are demanding that their name be put on the deed before they get married, so they co-own it and therefore must split it.
I hate authoritarianism. I hope the Chinese people will soon have fraydom and democracy so their sons can be gay and their daughters can sell their bodies on Onlyfans, like truly free people.
You only think that because you're in Europe. We're dealing with 5-8 million Indians in Canada, most of them rural Punjabi Sikhs, and the rate of sexual assaults, harassment of schoolgirls and violent religious conflicts playing out on our streets is pretty similar to what you have going on there. Not to mention all of the general dissolute behavior such as horribly dangerous driving, garbage dumping in green areas, shitting on the streets, in bus stops and on beaches, claiming our neighbourhoods as their own and setting up slumlord Ponzi schemes, scamming every person, workplace and government institution they interact with, etc.
Women's response will be the same as it always is: Threaten to play keep away, not realizing that removing divorce rapists from the marriage market is a feature, not a bug.
This doesn't really matter, most of the Chinese are dead broke, or heavily in debt because of the real estate markets crash. This seems like an effort to discourage divorce because the young people are broke and don't consider getting married or having children at all.
The chicks over in China have already figured out the way around this.
They are demanding that their name be put on the deed before they get married, so they co-own it and therefore must split it.
Just watched a video about the point you're making.
This one wench demanded he add her as a co-owner for his assets BEFORE they got married. He refused.
They still were scheduled to get married.
They get married.
On the wedding night she accused him of raping her.
He ends up in jail.
He had proof he didn't commit the act, but is still in jail until the case can be appealed.
Absolute clown show... even in China.
I hate authoritarianism. I hope the Chinese people will soon have fraydom and democracy so their sons can be gay and their daughters can sell their bodies on Onlyfans, like truly free people.
oh vey you forgot your mandatory jeets
The American mind cannot comprehend this, but Indians would be a breath of fresh air compared to what we are getting in Europe.
You only think that because you're in Europe. We're dealing with 5-8 million Indians in Canada, most of them rural Punjabi Sikhs, and the rate of sexual assaults, harassment of schoolgirls and violent religious conflicts playing out on our streets is pretty similar to what you have going on there. Not to mention all of the general dissolute behavior such as horribly dangerous driving, garbage dumping in green areas, shitting on the streets, in bus stops and on beaches, claiming our neighbourhoods as their own and setting up slumlord Ponzi schemes, scamming every person, workplace and government institution they interact with, etc.
I agree with you BUT that doesn’t make things better for either of us.
"breath of fresh air" so you don't know shit about street shitting, river shitting, shitting-anywhere-but-the-toilet Pajeets.
Yas! This is what our grandparents fought the Nazis for!
This sounds like Nazi fever dream. Shut it down!
Women's response will be the same as it always is: Threaten to play keep away, not realizing that removing divorce rapists from the marriage market is a feature, not a bug.
This doesn't really matter, most of the Chinese are dead broke, or heavily in debt because of the real estate markets crash. This seems like an effort to discourage divorce because the young people are broke and don't consider getting married or having children at all.
Good. GOOOOOD.
Everything is proceeding as I have forseen.