Oh, he's not a troll just nuts. Either way how does he improve the level of discussion here?
We're going in circles. Is it a requirement for someone to 'improve the level of discussion' to participate here?
I'll do it then, you are using the "thought-terminating cliché"
Not a cliche. It's pointing out that what you claim Imp is guilty of is pretty universal, so it can't be used to deny 1 person access to the board while leaving the others alone.
I think that the fact that he's a troll is enough reason.
But people never agreed with me on that, because, of course, a moderator can just decide that someone is a troll and ban him without due process.
Say what you want of Imp, but he's not a troll.
I disagree with you then.
Mostly because, as I pointed out, imp isn't consistent with his ideology and just wants to antagonize conpro
If you're that nuts, you're going to have blind spots - which you call inconsistencies.
I'm sure you and I have those as well. Just that no one calls us out on it.
Oh, he's not a troll just nuts. Either way how does he improve the level of discussion here?
I'll do it then, you are using the "thought-terminating cliché"
We're going in circles. Is it a requirement for someone to 'improve the level of discussion' to participate here?
Not a cliche. It's pointing out that what you claim Imp is guilty of is pretty universal, so it can't be used to deny 1 person access to the board while leaving the others alone.