Oh, he's not a troll just nuts. Either way how does he improve the level of discussion here?
We're going in circles. Is it a requirement for someone to 'improve the level of discussion' to participate here?
I'll do it then, you are using the "thought-terminating cliché"
Not a cliche. It's pointing out that what you claim Imp is guilty of is pretty universal, so it can't be used to deny 1 person access to the board while leaving the others alone.
If you're that nuts, you're going to have blind spots - which you call inconsistencies.
I'm sure you and I have those as well. Just that no one calls us out on it.
Oh, he's not a troll just nuts. Either way how does he improve the level of discussion here?
I'll do it then, you are using the "thought-terminating cliché"
We're going in circles. Is it a requirement for someone to 'improve the level of discussion' to participate here?
Not a cliche. It's pointing out that what you claim Imp is guilty of is pretty universal, so it can't be used to deny 1 person access to the board while leaving the others alone.
Ideally. Why are you here if you don't think there's value here nor you contribute value?
Do you prefer "semantic stop-sign"?
Ideally, yes. But if it's not a standard you are willing to hold everyone else to, it's unfair to have Imp banned over it.