I mean I don't know about you but even excluding the empty ones, the median room I walk into doesn't have 50+ people milling about in it.
I think anything above 90th percentile would probably still qualify as being the smartest in the room more often than not. The real question is do we tend to rate that metric too high?
If Indians were legitimately high IQ, then India wouldn’t be India.
Aren't even the "high IQ" ones just in the 115-120 (midwit) range?
120 isn't midwit range. 120 is often being the smartest one in a room.
Huh.
If you’re in a room of jeets maybe. 120 isn’t even in the top 2% of IQs.
I mean I don't know about you but even excluding the empty ones, the median room I walk into doesn't have 50+ people milling about in it.
I think anything above 90th percentile would probably still qualify as being the smartest in the room more often than not. The real question is do we tend to rate that metric too high?
I feel even worse about that.
Brushing your teeth in the Ganges is very high IQ mayomonkey.