Edit: since this apparently needs to be said, none of the following is my opinion. I'm summarizing the argument I've seen elsewhere.
Point one. Nuclear weapons were supposedly invented by several jews, a people who have perpetuated many hoaxes in service to their own interests over the centuries. Einstein was almost certainly a prolific plagiarist for example.
Point two, they were only ever deployed in war twice, and any witnesses to this are dead.
Point three, if you attempt for yourself to work out the science behind this in say, college, you get a visit from the same agency that visits the families of people killed by blacks.
Point four, Kennedy was assassinated more or less immediately after promising to reveal an astonishing secret that had been kept from the American people.
Point five, the nation of South Africa was urgently overthrown by a US backed color revolution after supposedly working out an independent nuclear weapons program for themselves.
Point six, damn near everything about the history of the first half of the twentieth century that is commonly considered a fact, is a filthy lie.
Now, several of these things can be explained by a combination of coincidences and a fully reasonable desire for the non proliferation of such a deadly weapon. The same things could also be plausibly explained as a long standing conspiracy to maintain the post WW2, UN controlled hegemony using the might of the United States as the enforcement arm. An enforcement arm that would be possible to challenge if the premise of an invincible weapon turned out to be a lie.
But at the core, whether you believe it or not boils down to the fact that you are choosing to believe something about commonly taught history of WW2. This is becoming increasingly unpalatable to many, for a variety of reasons.
Have you considered that saying nukes are fake is a way to further legitimize the holohoax? Why question that narrative when we can just push the narrative off the deep end and say nukes are fake and WW2 never happened.
Its like you and I inspecting something on the ground and some weird guy with a large nose dumps a pile of dirt on it.
Going from nukes are a hoax to WW2 never happened is quite the significant leap. That's like saying if you drink a beer you're gonna start smoking meth. Nukes are pretty irrelevant for the WW2 narrative. They're relevant for the post-war order.
Point two, they were only ever deployed in war twice, and any witnesses to this are dead.
We have pretty strong testimony from the people on the ground that were affected.......... unless they made that stuff up along with the photos of gigantic mushroom clouds
More to the point, legitimately denying that nuclear weapons exist involves denying that nuclear energy exists and that the millions of people who work in that industry are all conspiring liars. Nuclear fission powers both through almost exactly the same process. It makes no sense to assert that human beings were able to develop and exploit a source of energy that powerful but never weaponized it.
they were only ever deployed in war twice, and any witnesses to this are dead.
So the 2000 or so nuclear tests were... also fake? All those Bombs, over the decades, by all those nations (including hostile ones) all to help "the Jews"?
You believe this?
Do you think there's "a possibility" of this being true?
Edit: since this apparently needs to be said, none of the following is my opinion. I'm summarizing the argument I've seen elsewhere.
Point one. Nuclear weapons were supposedly invented by several jews, a people who have perpetuated many hoaxes in service to their own interests over the centuries. Einstein was almost certainly a prolific plagiarist for example.
Point two, they were only ever deployed in war twice, and any witnesses to this are dead.
Point three, if you attempt for yourself to work out the science behind this in say, college, you get a visit from the same agency that visits the families of people killed by blacks.
Point four, Kennedy was assassinated more or less immediately after promising to reveal an astonishing secret that had been kept from the American people.
Point five, the nation of South Africa was urgently overthrown by a US backed color revolution after supposedly working out an independent nuclear weapons program for themselves.
Point six, damn near everything about the history of the first half of the twentieth century that is commonly considered a fact, is a filthy lie.
Now, several of these things can be explained by a combination of coincidences and a fully reasonable desire for the non proliferation of such a deadly weapon. The same things could also be plausibly explained as a long standing conspiracy to maintain the post WW2, UN controlled hegemony using the might of the United States as the enforcement arm. An enforcement arm that would be possible to challenge if the premise of an invincible weapon turned out to be a lie.
But at the core, whether you believe it or not boils down to the fact that you are choosing to believe something about commonly taught history of WW2. This is becoming increasingly unpalatable to many, for a variety of reasons.
Have you considered that saying nukes are fake is a way to further legitimize the holohoax? Why question that narrative when we can just push the narrative off the deep end and say nukes are fake and WW2 never happened.
Its like you and I inspecting something on the ground and some weird guy with a large nose dumps a pile of dirt on it.
Going from nukes are a hoax to WW2 never happened is quite the significant leap. That's like saying if you drink a beer you're gonna start smoking meth. Nukes are pretty irrelevant for the WW2 narrative. They're relevant for the post-war order.
I don't especially think so.
I think questioning any significant portion of the narrative of early twentieth century history lends itself to asking further questions.
We have pretty strong testimony from the people on the ground that were affected.......... unless they made that stuff up along with the photos of gigantic mushroom clouds
More to the point, legitimately denying that nuclear weapons exist involves denying that nuclear energy exists and that the millions of people who work in that industry are all conspiring liars. Nuclear fission powers both through almost exactly the same process. It makes no sense to assert that human beings were able to develop and exploit a source of energy that powerful but never weaponized it.
While we're at it, maybe oil doesn't exist and it's a massive Semitic scam to maintain control over the US
So Russia and every other country having nukes is also a conspiracy by muh jews?
Interesting...
Not what I said.
What I did was elaborate the respective positions as I'm aware of them. I took no side, nor do I even especially have a position on it.
So the 2000 or so nuclear tests were... also fake? All those Bombs, over the decades, by all those nations (including hostile ones) all to help "the Jews"?
You believe this?
Do you think there's "a possibility" of this being true?
Did I say I believed this?
As I said to the other guy, I just wanted to put out the points I've seen from the people who were saying it.
Well thanks for that. It is just as stupid as I'd imagined it would be. The leftists never fail to fail, eh?