No, no, Massie is totally bad because he keeps voting against bills Trump puts forward, despite most of the bills never being read by those voting, containing massive increases in spending that Massie is on record as being against over and over again, countless other addendums that have nothing to do with the actual rhetoric surrounding the bills, and other talking points simply because he won't jump on the bandwagon like a good tribalist and vote red no matter what.
despite most of the bills never being read by those voting, containing massive increases in spending
And that's why I don't vote anymore. It's just a scam to trick us into handing over the consent of the governed, while those of us who aren't rich enough to hire a lobbying firm to put a senator in our pocket have little to no say in our government. But if enough people withdraw their consent, it can collapse like Eastern European communist governments did at the end of the Cold War.
Massie is a strange character. On one hand, the anti-AIPAC stuff makes him seem genuine. On the other, he endorsed DeSantis (the ultra-neoconservative nevertrumper choice) in 2024's primary, and he eagerly played the heel by opposing the BBB on open borders grounds (even if he hated the bill, he'd have to know that they weren't going to let it pass anyways, so he was burning political capital for nothing). Even the most fanatical true believer libertarian would have to understand at this point that he can get his personal utopia except for open borders or he can get a generic socialist hellhole because the people he let in want and vote for that outcome, so it's hard to assume good faith.
My conspiratorial side feels like his career is set up to try to create a wedge between noninterventionists and immigration restrictionists, and try to associate opposing AIPAC with wanting to let in infinity Guatemalans when, in reality, it's the AIPAC darlings that have always pushed amnesty behind the scenes. If he's sincere individually, then I'd guess that whoever convinced him DeSantis was a good guy is also behind his recent unforced errors. Everything would be so much better for him if he hadn't gone out of his way to burn bridges with the voters most supportive of his message.
I live in his district and he has never spoken publicly about his wife's death. I think she may have had an illness but anything is possible. He has TREMENDOUS support here. I wish he would run for McConnell's Senate seat.
That aside, what does this have to do with Trump making the decision to stop Iran's nuke program? He's not in congress, nor did congress do anything here besides get informed about the bombing.
So do you want PACs? Considering the conservative position is getting all the money out of politics, you coming out of the closet as a communist makes sense.
And again, what does this have to do with trump bombing iran? Can you manage to answer that? I'll wait.
So just to be clear, you’re siding with Chuck Schumer and against Scalia on PACs and claim I’m the communist? How shocking. “And again what does an Israeli PAC acting as a domestic PAC have to do with their influence on Trump?” You’re a disingenuous faggot to the core.
So you can't answer questions that are clear and concise, got it.
Yes, you faggots are all communists and traitors.
I liked scalia, but he had some bad opinions (privacy was another one he wasn't great about, if you actually knew anything instead just throwing names out). Just like alito isn't really pro free speech, but good on nearly everything else. Just like gorsuch is decent, but has a hard on for Indians and weird old laws sometimes.
So you can't answer questions that are clear and concise, got it.
You spent the entire time last night responding to questions with “goatfucker”. You’re as disingenuous as humanly possible if you think anyone should take your stupidity seriously now after you’ve poisoned the well.
Yes, you faggots are all communists and traitors.
You’re an Israeli dickrider, your opinion means nothing.
I liked scalia, but he had some bad opinions (privacy was another one he wasn't great about, if you actually knew anything instead just throwing names out). Just like alito isn't really pro free speech, but good on nearly everything else. Just like gorsuch is decent, but has a hard on for Indians and weird old laws sometimes.
Scalia argued the first amendment was written on speech not speakers. Are you claiming different little goatfucker?
I spent last night responding to bad faith questions by calling a bunch of terrorist supporting goat molesters just that, yes.
Strange how you're not capable of understanding the difference. Or maybe not.
Are you claiming different little goatfucker?
Why are you projecting your fetishes onto me?
And yes, scalia was wrong. His opinion is the vast minority opinion in terms of legality, constitutionality, and public opinion.
The conservative position is "politics in money is bad". Especially dark money, funneled through third parties so it can't be easily traced back to people paying for it. You can see this with your buddies at shareblue, and how corrupt they are. But you support it.
I dunno man. Seems like a lefty position to take, but that fits you and your buddies mo
I spent last night responding to bad faith questions by calling a bunch of terrorist supporting goat molesters just that, yes
Really?! Name a bad faith question that I gave you last night. Oh wait, you have selective discernment on what is “bad faith” because you have no actual argument. Again you’re completely disingenuous.
And yes, scalia was wrong. His opinion is the vast minority opinion in terms of legality, constitutionality, and public opinion.
He gave the constitutional answer, the fact you tried to lump in public opinion shows again, that you’re a communist, we’re a constitutional republic, not a democracy.
The conservative position is "politics in money is bad". Especially dark money, funneled through third parties so it can't be easily traced back to people paying for it. You can see this with your buddies at shareblue, and how corrupt they are. But you support it.
Which is why we have regulations like FARA and why magically ActBlue executives resigned overnight when they were caught because it was illegal. Again you’re being as disingenuous as humanly possible.
I dunno man. Seems like a lefty position to take, but that fits you and your buddies mo
Yeah it’s so lefty that only democrats have advocated for the repeal of citizens united and only democrats voted against it on the ruling. Again disingenuous as humanly possible.
Oh, and I just noticed that retweet was today.
Absolute legend.
For the record: Thomas Massie did not kill himself.
This man is a patriot.
No, no, Massie is totally bad because he keeps voting against bills Trump puts forward, despite most of the bills never being read by those voting, containing massive increases in spending that Massie is on record as being against over and over again, countless other addendums that have nothing to do with the actual rhetoric surrounding the bills, and other talking points simply because he won't jump on the bandwagon like a good tribalist and vote red no matter what.
His wife, though...
And that's why I don't vote anymore. It's just a scam to trick us into handing over the consent of the governed, while those of us who aren't rich enough to hire a lobbying firm to put a senator in our pocket have little to no say in our government. But if enough people withdraw their consent, it can collapse like Eastern European communist governments did at the end of the Cold War.
Massie is a strange character. On one hand, the anti-AIPAC stuff makes him seem genuine. On the other, he endorsed DeSantis (the ultra-neoconservative nevertrumper choice) in 2024's primary, and he eagerly played the heel by opposing the BBB on open borders grounds (even if he hated the bill, he'd have to know that they weren't going to let it pass anyways, so he was burning political capital for nothing). Even the most fanatical true believer libertarian would have to understand at this point that he can get his personal utopia except for open borders or he can get a generic socialist hellhole because the people he let in want and vote for that outcome, so it's hard to assume good faith.
My conspiratorial side feels like his career is set up to try to create a wedge between noninterventionists and immigration restrictionists, and try to associate opposing AIPAC with wanting to let in infinity Guatemalans when, in reality, it's the AIPAC darlings that have always pushed amnesty behind the scenes. If he's sincere individually, then I'd guess that whoever convinced him DeSantis was a good guy is also behind his recent unforced errors. Everything would be so much better for him if he hadn't gone out of his way to burn bridges with the voters most supportive of his message.
He's not gonna kill himself, he's just going to get primaried.
Thomas Massie seems to be one of the good ones!
Legendary interview. For both politics, and to hear about his property and the house he built himself.
Sadly, they killed his wife for him speaking out (on the politics presumably.)
But, yeah, his wife Died Suddenly right after this. Legitimately very sad.
I live in his district and he has never spoken publicly about his wife's death. I think she may have had an illness but anything is possible. He has TREMENDOUS support here. I wish he would run for McConnell's Senate seat.
His house design is honestly really cool.
Cool, cool. Ban all PACs, domestic or foreign.
That aside, what does this have to do with Trump making the decision to stop Iran's nuke program? He's not in congress, nor did congress do anything here besides get informed about the bombing.
Oh look, the retarded liberal is making the same argument as Chuck Schumer. Shall we rewrite the first amendment for you too, retard?
So do you want PACs? Considering the conservative position is getting all the money out of politics, you coming out of the closet as a communist makes sense.
And again, what does this have to do with trump bombing iran? Can you manage to answer that? I'll wait.
So just to be clear, you’re siding with Chuck Schumer and against Scalia on PACs and claim I’m the communist? How shocking. “And again what does an Israeli PAC acting as a domestic PAC have to do with their influence on Trump?” You’re a disingenuous faggot to the core.
So you can't answer questions that are clear and concise, got it.
Yes, you faggots are all communists and traitors.
I liked scalia, but he had some bad opinions (privacy was another one he wasn't great about, if you actually knew anything instead just throwing names out). Just like alito isn't really pro free speech, but good on nearly everything else. Just like gorsuch is decent, but has a hard on for Indians and weird old laws sometimes.
You spent the entire time last night responding to questions with “goatfucker”. You’re as disingenuous as humanly possible if you think anyone should take your stupidity seriously now after you’ve poisoned the well.
You’re an Israeli dickrider, your opinion means nothing.
Scalia argued the first amendment was written on speech not speakers. Are you claiming different little goatfucker?
I spent last night responding to bad faith questions by calling a bunch of terrorist supporting goat molesters just that, yes.
Strange how you're not capable of understanding the difference. Or maybe not.
Why are you projecting your fetishes onto me?
And yes, scalia was wrong. His opinion is the vast minority opinion in terms of legality, constitutionality, and public opinion.
The conservative position is "politics in money is bad". Especially dark money, funneled through third parties so it can't be easily traced back to people paying for it. You can see this with your buddies at shareblue, and how corrupt they are. But you support it.
I dunno man. Seems like a lefty position to take, but that fits you and your buddies mo
Really?! Name a bad faith question that I gave you last night. Oh wait, you have selective discernment on what is “bad faith” because you have no actual argument. Again you’re completely disingenuous.
He gave the constitutional answer, the fact you tried to lump in public opinion shows again, that you’re a communist, we’re a constitutional republic, not a democracy.
Which is why we have regulations like FARA and why magically ActBlue executives resigned overnight when they were caught because it was illegal. Again you’re being as disingenuous as humanly possible.
Yeah it’s so lefty that only democrats have advocated for the repeal of citizens united and only democrats voted against it on the ruling. Again disingenuous as humanly possible.
Isnt he also financed by a pro israel jew, yass?