Based on his replies if there wasn't one before there is now. And Matt Walsh on his show mentioned he doesn't do chores because he pays for everything which got some debate as well.
Instead of assuming you could literally read the debate that is literally occurring right now by clicking on the OP link.
His wife immediately replied with "yes", so I think the debate started offline and he's trying to publicly shame the lazy hoe into doing her share. A valid tactic given how much women are driven by shame avoidance, but it's pretty hamstrung by boomercons who's only skillset is immediate capitulation taking the wife's side.
I'm not Imp, just a guy who sometimes gets targeted by his fanclub when this topic comes up. I'm a lot less eager to denounce rule 2 solutions than he is.
If both work, then the chores are split. If someone is not bringing in money, they do the chores. Gender has nothing to do with this arrangement, yet you'll never get a feminist to agree with it unless it's the guy staying home (and the wife will be looking for an upgrade at work anyway)
There would be zero debate if husbands had adequate authority over their households, but alas we live in a hellscape.
The answer is obviously no.
150%? How dare you undervalue her golden vajayjay! It's 1000% you incel.
Who is debating this, and why didn't you link to said debate?
Posobec's wife a whole bunch of tradcuck male influencers who think yes, a husband is apparently a slave. Vs. posobec and some more based characters.
There's a debate in the replies to promo code POSO's tweets.
WTF is a "promo code POSO" ?
A joke about sponsored videos would be my guess.
mypillow.com/poso
I thought it might be that. I'm just going to assume that there is no such debate occurring, and he made this shit up for click bait.
It's less a debate than something that's taken for granted in women's circles. Calling it a debate might be clickbaity but he's not making it up.
Dual income households are the norm. The 100% of the money pre-condition is rarely met.
But when it is, it's even more rare they don't still feel like the expectation of doing chores is too much.
Based on his replies if there wasn't one before there is now. And Matt Walsh on his show mentioned he doesn't do chores because he pays for everything which got some debate as well.
Instead of assuming you could literally read the debate that is literally occurring right now by clicking on the OP link.
If the debate didn't exist until he started it with this tweet then my assumption that he made it up for clickbait looks correct to me.
His wife immediately replied with "yes", so I think the debate started offline and he's trying to publicly shame the lazy hoe into doing her share. A valid tactic given how much women are driven by shame avoidance, but it's pretty hamstrung by boomercons who's only skillset is immediate capitulation taking the wife's side.
Jack repeatedly likes to throw around his promo code
https://x.com/search?q=from%3AJackPosobiec%20%22promo%20code%20POSO%22&src=typed_query
Debra Barrone
if you have to bean count count how much you contribute compared to how much your wife contributes, it's not a good relationship in the first place.
The correct answer is that man makes 100% of the money and does 100% of the housework and throws the parasite on the street where she belongs.
welcome back, Imp
I'm not Imp, just a guy who sometimes gets targeted by his fanclub when this topic comes up. I'm a lot less eager to denounce rule 2 solutions than he is.
If both work, then the chores are split. If someone is not bringing in money, they do the chores. Gender has nothing to do with this arrangement, yet you'll never get a feminist to agree with it unless it's the guy staying home (and the wife will be looking for an upgrade at work anyway)
The fuck? Hell yeah I want at least 50 percent influence over my children, I'm not gonna let my wife raise my kids soft.
I don't see "child care"=parenting