The Arab revolt was in response to ongoing Jewish settlement there, literally a Great Replacement.
Sure, all of it was in response to Jewish settlement, just like Indians fighting English settlers. I wouldn't say that the settlers are therefore guilty of starting the hostilities.
I didn't accuse the settlers of starting the war until they actually did start open terrorism, hence dating the start in the 1940s rather than earlier.
But if the settlers were already being massacred before, how could they have started it aftewards? Unless you want to claim that settlement itself is an act of aggression - but then you should have predated the time when 'the Jews stared it'.
Gasp, are you saying that the Jews replaced the Arabs who replaced the Christians?
If only we'd let the children Muslim invaders keep the land that they had rightfully stolen from the locals! How could we have been so cruel as to let this happen?!
The Jews were always there. "Palestine" didn't even exist as a nation until a few years ago. The far right loges to cite their crusader chants referencing muh palestine as proof of their fake country.
The Jews were always there, for 3000 years. "Palestinians" didn't even exist as a "nation" until invented by the KGB in the 60's. It was a term for people who lived in the REGION not a specific group like the Druse or Bedouin.
You cannot "replace" people who took away your land in the first place. It isn't colonization to return to your homeland.
So they started the war in the 1940s, after the Arab revolt which was in the 1930s, and the 1929 Hebron massacre?
The perpetrators of the Hebron massacre were prosecuted, some even executed.
The Arab revolt was in response to ongoing Jewish settlement there, literally a Great Replacement.
Sure, all of it was in response to Jewish settlement, just like Indians fighting English settlers. I wouldn't say that the settlers are therefore guilty of starting the hostilities.
I didn't accuse the settlers of starting the war until they actually did start open terrorism, hence dating the start in the 1940s rather than earlier.
But if the settlers were already being massacred before, how could they have started it aftewards? Unless you want to claim that settlement itself is an act of aggression - but then you should have predated the time when 'the Jews stared it'.
Gasp, are you saying that the Jews replaced the Arabs who replaced the Christians?
If only we'd let the children Muslim invaders keep the land that they had rightfully stolen from the locals! How could we have been so cruel as to let this happen?!
Why would Arabs replacing Christians entitle Jews to settle there? They hate Christians.
If you disagree with my start date for the war, when do you think it started?
The Jews were always there. "Palestine" didn't even exist as a nation until a few years ago. The far right loges to cite their crusader chants referencing muh palestine as proof of their fake country.
The Jews were always there, for 3000 years. "Palestinians" didn't even exist as a "nation" until invented by the KGB in the 60's. It was a term for people who lived in the REGION not a specific group like the Druse or Bedouin.
You cannot "replace" people who took away your land in the first place. It isn't colonization to return to your homeland.