I'm not even the guy who argues that it's an intentional race war against whites, but you can't deny that demographic replacement is happening.

What you see when you look in the details is that it's not like it would be with a genocide, where you replace on group with another. It's that they are basically overwhelming groups that exist already, with everyone they can get their hands on. Even blacks are getting demographically replaced in some areas. The issue is that authoritarians are intentionally trying to create a party-boss system where each ethnic group is represented by an ethno-political loyalty system, and they intend to create a coalition of these party-boss systems, and then formalize it. The US isn't being turned into Zimbabwe, Israel, or South Africa; it's being turned into Lebanon. That is the final point of multi-culturalism where each ethnic and religious group is governed by political bodies that are strictly regulated in the government in order to basically use each ethnic group as a political block of influence to pass legislation.

There was no part of this that was haphazard or unintentional. The question is why, and I believe the simple answer is control.

There is a second explanation to this that Academic Agent came up with called "Human Quantitative Easing".

To make a complex economic topic very simple, if you print money, that is inflation, not price rises. Prices rise as an effect of inflation. If you print money, the person you give it to first benefits the most because the market hasn't adapted to the money injection (see: Cantillon Effect). The person who gets it last, not only gets no benefit, but also suffers from the loss of his purchasing power before he even gets the money.

So, if you print money, and want to keep price rises from happening all at once, you have to have to give it to one person who promises to doll it out very slowly. This is how the banks get bailed out. They hold the money, and then issue it out slowly, keeping the money from flooding the market and causing price shocks. Price rises happen, but slower.

But, if you don't give it to the banks, and you are going to suddenly give everyone $2,000 Trump-bucks during Covid like many countries did, that money is going to shock the market. The only way to keep people from spending the money... is to prevent business from even being open. Like the Lockdowns.

But what if you pump in SO MUCH MONEY, that even lockdown aren't enough. Well, the equation is still true, the purchasing power of money varies by how much currency is being used by the people in the system.

BUT ALL OF THIS ASSUMES THAT THE POPULATION STAYS THE SAME.

What if we increase the number of currency units, reduce the amount people can spend... ... ... and then increase the amount of people?

Well, that would significantly help mask price rises. Yes, there would be more currency units in the system, but there would also be more people for each currency unit, which would keep price rises from spiking.

Of course, the more money you print, the more people you would have to import. And if, oh, say, you printed 30% of all dollars that have ever existed, you'd have to import impossibly large numbers of people, even while businesses were closed, and you'd have to force dollars into the hands of those unemployed foreigners through some sort of elaborate welfare state.

But, I mean, that would never happen

right?