Okay, retard, show me in state law where it's illegal to be white. It's not a meme anymore right? You're not just pushing race slop for updoots, right? You're not literally just posting recycled memes in a DAE post, right? No, it's actually illegal to be white now. I'm sure you can document how much of a not-faggot you are.
Still working on that “reading comprehension” and those “extrapolative statements about the future,” huh Giz? I’m sure you can figure it out someday if you really try hard.
We're there now, though, right? It's coming any day now. It's definitely true now because it was extrapolative to today. It's not like people are explicitly witnessing blowback against black identitarianism right now. That would never happen. Like, for example, if a white woman said the n-word at a black kid, there is no chance that she'd have a fundraiser with over 500k. That would never happen because we're living in the future of this meme which predicted she'd be arrested, not for saying words, but for existing as a white person. This isn't an edgy meme, it's true, that's why we can't just pass it off, right?
We're definitely not just flooding the forum with race-war nonsense to push a political agenda. DAE blacks, am I right?
The thing about any statement about the future is that it can be avoided, too. But if you can’t look at a world where that woman calling a child stealing from her a mean word results in her getting doxxed, having threats sent to her, having big organizations like the NAACP getting involved, getting CPS called, and think “oh, I see how this could get worse” then you are fucked up in the head. Don’t get me wrong, it’s great that she’s getting support. Not too long ago, that wouldn’t have happened. But to say “here’s an example of pushback, therefore we are out of the woods” is insane. Especially because we don’t even know yet if she’ll get the money. We don’t even know yet what consequences she might face. Because there certainly can be consequences.
You want to see a possible (not guaranteed, but possible) future of any Western nation, go look at South Africa. Tell me with a straight face that they’re not steadily approaching making being white illegal.
People like Gitz are always trying to deracialize the discourse the moment it threatens to generate racial awareness among whites. So when the Shiloh situation gives us even a glimmer of hope that whites are waking up to the multiracial battle royale that defines our current reality, Gitz is Johnny on the spot, ready to tell us what that small glimmer really means: that the anti-whiteness was all in your head and/or you’ve already achieved total victory over anti-whiteness. Never mind that these are mutually exclusive claims. All that matters is you never adopt the racial/ethnic in-group biases that are 100% the norm for every non-white cohort on the planet.
Then Gitz turns around and accuses people like us of being the true enemies of white people, of “sliding the forum” with “race slop”. He’s just a classic libertarian retard who has made it his mission to subvert one of the very few online spaces that isn’t afraid to recognize the explicitly racial nature of our current conflict.
It’s encouraging to see him routinely downvoted through the floor.
South Africa is not approaching white people being illegal. They are approaching a secession crisis by whites.
In any case, the issue at hand is not that things could get worse, but that the hyperbole is so extreme it's not possible (even in South Africa), while you are literally watching a reversal of the trend... all again, in order to score updoots.
The way things are going, very soon, just being white will be a major hate crime.
OP: " Anyone else miss the days when you could just laugh this off as edgy /pol/ meming?"
He's saying you can't just laugh this off as memeing as easily anymore. He's not saying it's already happened. He's saying it's much less easily dismissed.
And he's correct. This used to be more absurd but, especially with social media use as universal as it is now, we're seeing many more instances where the attitude of various parties (and yes, that includes prosecutors, so in some instances it is an unspoken crime to be white, or at least an exacerbating fact) is that it's not okay to be white.
In fact, "It's Okay to Be White" is a controversial statement.
If it's not easily dismissed, then it should be really obvious that we are on track to make white people illegal. Clearly, that isn't a psychotic hyperbole anymore. Don't say it's just "it's not okay to be white is a controversial statement", because that was a scandal from 4chan as well, from the very era of this meme. That's very old culture war stuff at this point. Clearly we are much further along the path laid out by the meme. And one thing we can absolutely say is that we are absolutely NOT literally witnessing at this very moment an obvious backlash to the moral authority of Black Supremacism.
You know this too.
You might as well be saying, "I know those local British elections are over and Labour have as many local council seats as the Green Party, but if we keep going the way things were going in 2023, Labour will have full political dominance over the country." You are arguing against the opposite of reality, presented in front of you, that you are explicitly participating in.
I was referring to the concept of "slop" in the literal fashion after the brew-ha-ha last year regarding foods that were slop and foods that were orderly meals.
South Africa seems to be going that way and going just by DIE initiatives and how minorities seem to behave once they get in power it does seem things are not looking optimistic.
At the very least second hand citizens with a judicial system that will work against us.
Black kid kills white kid vs white woman say the n word.
It's not about 'minorities' getting into power, it's about allowing rampaging communist terrorists getting into power. Leftists just use identity groups as human shields for the most part.
In any case, South Africa's situation is wildly worse than anything in the west, let alone the US. And again, you are literally watching the blowback take place.
You're so used to losing you didn't even notice you had a win.
Okay, retard, show me in state law where it's illegal to be white. It's not a meme anymore right? You're not just pushing race slop for updoots, right? You're not literally just posting recycled memes in a DAE post, right? No, it's actually illegal to be white now. I'm sure you can document how much of a not-faggot you are.
Still working on that “reading comprehension” and those “extrapolative statements about the future,” huh Giz? I’m sure you can figure it out someday if you really try hard.
We're there now, though, right? It's coming any day now. It's definitely true now because it was extrapolative to today. It's not like people are explicitly witnessing blowback against black identitarianism right now. That would never happen. Like, for example, if a white woman said the n-word at a black kid, there is no chance that she'd have a fundraiser with over 500k. That would never happen because we're living in the future of this meme which predicted she'd be arrested, not for saying words, but for existing as a white person. This isn't an edgy meme, it's true, that's why we can't just pass it off, right?
We're definitely not just flooding the forum with race-war nonsense to push a political agenda. DAE blacks, am I right?
The thing about any statement about the future is that it can be avoided, too. But if you can’t look at a world where that woman calling a child stealing from her a mean word results in her getting doxxed, having threats sent to her, having big organizations like the NAACP getting involved, getting CPS called, and think “oh, I see how this could get worse” then you are fucked up in the head. Don’t get me wrong, it’s great that she’s getting support. Not too long ago, that wouldn’t have happened. But to say “here’s an example of pushback, therefore we are out of the woods” is insane. Especially because we don’t even know yet if she’ll get the money. We don’t even know yet what consequences she might face. Because there certainly can be consequences.
What we do know is that you can still, easily, find plenty of situations where a black person did something way worse and was not subject to anywhere near the same level of controversy or media attention. Karmelo Anthony is the obvious example—not least because the fundraising platform which both are on has been more squirrelly about Shiloh’s fundraiser than his—but there’s also stuff like the guy that randomly threw a five year old kid off a balcony, or the dunkin donuts employee that killed a guy for calling him a “nigger.”
You want to see a possible (not guaranteed, but possible) future of any Western nation, go look at South Africa. Tell me with a straight face that they’re not steadily approaching making being white illegal.
People like Gitz are always trying to deracialize the discourse the moment it threatens to generate racial awareness among whites. So when the Shiloh situation gives us even a glimmer of hope that whites are waking up to the multiracial battle royale that defines our current reality, Gitz is Johnny on the spot, ready to tell us what that small glimmer really means: that the anti-whiteness was all in your head and/or you’ve already achieved total victory over anti-whiteness. Never mind that these are mutually exclusive claims. All that matters is you never adopt the racial/ethnic in-group biases that are 100% the norm for every non-white cohort on the planet.
Then Gitz turns around and accuses people like us of being the true enemies of white people, of “sliding the forum” with “race slop”. He’s just a classic libertarian retard who has made it his mission to subvert one of the very few online spaces that isn’t afraid to recognize the explicitly racial nature of our current conflict.
It’s encouraging to see him routinely downvoted through the floor.
South Africa is not approaching white people being illegal. They are approaching a secession crisis by whites.
In any case, the issue at hand is not that things could get worse, but that the hyperbole is so extreme it's not possible (even in South Africa), while you are literally watching a reversal of the trend... all again, in order to score updoots.
Do you really think effete sarcasm is a proper substitute for clever wit?
No, because it's not about wit, it's about showing how fucking stupid the sentiment is.
The meme: "The way things are going, very soon..."
It's still very hyperbolic, but no one is claiming it's illegal to be white; neither OP or the meme.
Has it gotten there yet? It was "very soon" from a meme that was several years old. So it must be true by now, right?
Definitely not slop, right?
Reading comprehension, dude!
OP: " Anyone else miss the days when you could just laugh this off as edgy /pol/ meming?"
He's saying you can't just laugh this off as memeing as easily anymore. He's not saying it's already happened. He's saying it's much less easily dismissed.
And he's correct. This used to be more absurd but, especially with social media use as universal as it is now, we're seeing many more instances where the attitude of various parties (and yes, that includes prosecutors, so in some instances it is an unspoken crime to be white, or at least an exacerbating fact) is that it's not okay to be white.
In fact, "It's Okay to Be White" is a controversial statement.
You know all this, too.
Understanding hyperbole as a literary device has to be an IQ signifier, along with conditional hypotheticals and significance of per capita.
If it's not easily dismissed, then it should be really obvious that we are on track to make white people illegal. Clearly, that isn't a psychotic hyperbole anymore. Don't say it's just "it's not okay to be white is a controversial statement", because that was a scandal from 4chan as well, from the very era of this meme. That's very old culture war stuff at this point. Clearly we are much further along the path laid out by the meme. And one thing we can absolutely say is that we are absolutely NOT literally witnessing at this very moment an obvious backlash to the moral authority of Black Supremacism.
You know this too.
You might as well be saying, "I know those local British elections are over and Labour have as many local council seats as the Green Party, but if we keep going the way things were going in 2023, Labour will have full political dominance over the country." You are arguing against the opposite of reality, presented in front of you, that you are explicitly participating in.
Derived from “goy slop”. This is one of your biggest tells ;)
I was referring to the concept of "slop" in the literal fashion after the brew-ha-ha last year regarding foods that were slop and foods that were orderly meals.
Big “woke right” energy from Gitz lol
But consider it's the left who are the real racists
Stop being a faggot and I won't call your bullshit out.
South Africa seems to be going that way and going just by DIE initiatives and how minorities seem to behave once they get in power it does seem things are not looking optimistic.
At the very least second hand citizens with a judicial system that will work against us.
Black kid kills white kid vs white woman say the n word.
It's not about 'minorities' getting into power, it's about allowing rampaging communist terrorists getting into power. Leftists just use identity groups as human shields for the most part.
In any case, South Africa's situation is wildly worse than anything in the west, let alone the US. And again, you are literally watching the blowback take place.
You're so used to losing you didn't even notice you had a win.
You are the Jewiest Jew to Jew here.
I don't have enough dradles for that.