Still working on that “reading comprehension” and those “extrapolative statements about the future,” huh Giz? I’m sure you can figure it out someday if you really try hard.
We're there now, though, right? It's coming any day now. It's definitely true now because it was extrapolative to today. It's not like people are explicitly witnessing blowback against black identitarianism right now. That would never happen. Like, for example, if a white woman said the n-word at a black kid, there is no chance that she'd have a fundraiser with over 500k. That would never happen because we're living in the future of this meme which predicted she'd be arrested, not for saying words, but for existing as a white person. This isn't an edgy meme, it's true, that's why we can't just pass it off, right?
We're definitely not just flooding the forum with race-war nonsense to push a political agenda. DAE blacks, am I right?
The thing about any statement about the future is that it can be avoided, too. But if you can’t look at a world where that woman calling a child stealing from her a mean word results in her getting doxxed, having threats sent to her, having big organizations like the NAACP getting involved, getting CPS called, and think “oh, I see how this could get worse” then you are fucked up in the head. Don’t get me wrong, it’s great that she’s getting support. Not too long ago, that wouldn’t have happened. But to say “here’s an example of pushback, therefore we are out of the woods” is insane. Especially because we don’t even know yet if she’ll get the money. We don’t even know yet what consequences she might face. Because there certainly can be consequences.
You want to see a possible (not guaranteed, but possible) future of any Western nation, go look at South Africa. Tell me with a straight face that they’re not steadily approaching making being white illegal.
People like Gitz are always trying to deracialize the discourse the moment it threatens to generate racial awareness among whites. So when the Shiloh situation gives us even a glimmer of hope that whites are waking up to the multiracial battle royale that defines our current reality, Gitz is Johnny on the spot, ready to tell us what that small glimmer really means: that the anti-whiteness was all in your head and/or you’ve already achieved total victory over anti-whiteness. Never mind that these are mutually exclusive claims. All that matters is you never adopt the racial/ethnic in-group biases that are 100% the norm for every non-white cohort on the planet.
Then Gitz turns around and accuses people like us of being the true enemies of white people, of “sliding the forum” with “race slop”. He’s just a classic libertarian retard who has made it his mission to subvert one of the very few online spaces that isn’t afraid to recognize the explicitly racial nature of our current conflict.
It’s encouraging to see him routinely downvoted through the floor.
Colorblindness worked when we were still a relatively well-off, wealthy and prosperous nation. Now the chips are down and Whites are the only ones being admonished for "seeing race" while all other groups are acting in ethnic interests first, last and only. Pushing it now is encouraging demographic suicide.
South Africa is not approaching white people being illegal. They are approaching a secession crisis by whites.
In any case, the issue at hand is not that things could get worse, but that the hyperbole is so extreme it's not possible (even in South Africa), while you are literally watching a reversal of the trend... all again, in order to score updoots.
Still working on that “reading comprehension” and those “extrapolative statements about the future,” huh Giz? I’m sure you can figure it out someday if you really try hard.
We're there now, though, right? It's coming any day now. It's definitely true now because it was extrapolative to today. It's not like people are explicitly witnessing blowback against black identitarianism right now. That would never happen. Like, for example, if a white woman said the n-word at a black kid, there is no chance that she'd have a fundraiser with over 500k. That would never happen because we're living in the future of this meme which predicted she'd be arrested, not for saying words, but for existing as a white person. This isn't an edgy meme, it's true, that's why we can't just pass it off, right?
We're definitely not just flooding the forum with race-war nonsense to push a political agenda. DAE blacks, am I right?
The thing about any statement about the future is that it can be avoided, too. But if you can’t look at a world where that woman calling a child stealing from her a mean word results in her getting doxxed, having threats sent to her, having big organizations like the NAACP getting involved, getting CPS called, and think “oh, I see how this could get worse” then you are fucked up in the head. Don’t get me wrong, it’s great that she’s getting support. Not too long ago, that wouldn’t have happened. But to say “here’s an example of pushback, therefore we are out of the woods” is insane. Especially because we don’t even know yet if she’ll get the money. We don’t even know yet what consequences she might face. Because there certainly can be consequences.
What we do know is that you can still, easily, find plenty of situations where a black person did something way worse and was not subject to anywhere near the same level of controversy or media attention. Karmelo Anthony is the obvious example—not least because the fundraising platform which both are on has been more squirrelly about Shiloh’s fundraiser than his—but there’s also stuff like the guy that randomly threw a five year old kid off a balcony, or the dunkin donuts employee that killed a guy for calling him a “nigger.”
You want to see a possible (not guaranteed, but possible) future of any Western nation, go look at South Africa. Tell me with a straight face that they’re not steadily approaching making being white illegal.
People like Gitz are always trying to deracialize the discourse the moment it threatens to generate racial awareness among whites. So when the Shiloh situation gives us even a glimmer of hope that whites are waking up to the multiracial battle royale that defines our current reality, Gitz is Johnny on the spot, ready to tell us what that small glimmer really means: that the anti-whiteness was all in your head and/or you’ve already achieved total victory over anti-whiteness. Never mind that these are mutually exclusive claims. All that matters is you never adopt the racial/ethnic in-group biases that are 100% the norm for every non-white cohort on the planet.
Then Gitz turns around and accuses people like us of being the true enemies of white people, of “sliding the forum” with “race slop”. He’s just a classic libertarian retard who has made it his mission to subvert one of the very few online spaces that isn’t afraid to recognize the explicitly racial nature of our current conflict.
It’s encouraging to see him routinely downvoted through the floor.
Colorblindness worked when we were still a relatively well-off, wealthy and prosperous nation. Now the chips are down and Whites are the only ones being admonished for "seeing race" while all other groups are acting in ethnic interests first, last and only. Pushing it now is encouraging demographic suicide.
South Africa is not approaching white people being illegal. They are approaching a secession crisis by whites.
In any case, the issue at hand is not that things could get worse, but that the hyperbole is so extreme it's not possible (even in South Africa), while you are literally watching a reversal of the trend... all again, in order to score updoots.
Do you really think effete sarcasm is a proper substitute for clever wit?
No, because it's not about wit, it's about showing how fucking stupid the sentiment is.