For an entire month, rScience had a study pinned as the top post that showed no adverse effects from the vaccine, and that vaccinated ppl actually shown a slightly lower risk for myocarditis.
I look into it and find out the study was funded and supervised by Pfizer. (not secret info, just cleverly obfuscated)
I post it as a comment and it gets shadow-banned. Then I find out that they are banning actual virologists who are pointing this out.
Some months later an independent replication study is published contradicting almost every finding of the Pfizer study.
rScience unpins the first study, but still removes anyone mentioning the second study.
I should have archived the whole thing because now everybody is in "that never happened" mode
For an entire month, rScience had a study pinned as the top post that showed no adverse effects from the vaccine, and that vaccinated ppl actually shown a slightly lower risk for myocarditis.
I look into it and find out the study was funded and supervised by Pfizer. (not secret info, just cleverly obfuscated) I post it as a comment and it gets shadow-banned. Then I find out that they are banning actual virologists who are pointing this out.
Some months later an independent replication study is published contradicting almost every finding of the Pfizer study. rScience unpins the first study, but still removes anyone mentioning the second study.
I should have archived the whole thing because now everybody is in "that never happened" mode
If you did archive it then they would just be in "science is evolving and nobody really did anything wrong" or "what difference does it make?" mode.
There exists only the present, in which The Party is always right.
That's why I archive everything I want to study later. It's really sad that this has to be followed