Lefty Friends think they understand science and sexuality again
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (47)
sorted by:
Ah yes, falling back to MEDICAL DISORDERS to show that it's not binary, except for the fact that these are both measurable and often treatable.
They're also extremely rare, unnatural, and undesirable. It's like saying that since there are e a few two-headed snakes in nature, we should run around sewing second heads on a ton more.
It's subtle propaganda. The message is that people "shouldn't be forced into male and female", then why troons want to be seen as female so badly?
To build on that lefty logic:
There are men who wear skirts.
There are men who develop moobs
There are men who have no penis
etc
All of which are encouraged by the left. The first and third because they're perverts, and the second because they push a soy based diet.
"If I'm not a woman than why do I have tits?!!"
"Because you're just fat. Those aren't breasts."
It's the classic "average humans have fewer than four limbs" canard.
And they're disorders. That's like saying humans don't have 2 arms and 2 legs just because some poor bastards are born with malformed limbs.
"If I find an exception to the rule, then it proves the rule never works."
"Okay, Communism killed 35 million people in China. That is the exception that proves Communism can never work."
"Biological Sex has never been tried."
Pretty sure the ~100 million of its own citizens that international communism killed in the previous century is the rule, not the exception.
No, the rule is that Communism can't NOT work.
Each of those deaths was an exception.
Also, all those are still binary.
Not one of them is developing a third, unique sexual organ or characteristic.
This is true, and is often lost in the discussion, appreciate the highlight.