It's what you're doing. My issue is that segregation is not needed.
Why are you intentionally supporting violence against whites again? Oh right, kill as many whites as you want so you can argue some political abstraction is better.
You don't have an objection to this murder, you support it.
Maybe I'm not enough of a profile stalker to be aware of a greater context, but as far as I can see for this thread, the only thing u/EBernays has said looks absolutely nothing like what you've accused him of in this unhinged post.
“Get in here or you’re going to get hit with a spear!”
“Pfft, I’m not going to be a collectivist loser.”
<gets hit with spear>
The funniest part is that you are so gung ho about your immediate friends and family being strapped and ready to roll, but you can’t wrap your head around a community or a nation wanting that same security and solidarity. You’re still collectivist. You’ve just drawn the line at your own preference.
You are never someone who would invite anyone in without stabbing them in the back first. Being your ally is no different than being your enemy, except people have a better chance at survival fighting you then helping you.
My friends and family are fine to fight you as well. You would never protect us. You would stab us in the chest, claim that someone else did it, ask for money, then stab us in the back, and then call us race traitors for [insert latest political excuse to monopolize power here]. Same shit different day. Just as with any communist, it is always better to be dead than red, because being red means you get to die more slowly and you're guaranteed to lose.
You do not now, never have, and never will represent the interests of any group but your masters and their objectives. You are not a friend to white people. You are not a white ally. You do not represent whites. You are simply a Leftist and never anything else. The rest of us have families and friends.
You're still a collectivist. You've just drawn the line at your own preference.
That's called individualism, faggot. I get to draw the line at who I choose to affiliate with, and it ain't ever you.
There's this thing called reality, where opposing ideas can meet and cause nuance, where more than two things can be true at the same time, and alter sound judgments beyond the false dichotomies that you, the left, and the normie right like to claim.
Reality meets in the middle, between self destructive individualism and self destructive collectivism. The non-normie right aren't pure collectivists. We just acknowledge that collective interests do indeed exist, and must be acknowledged and accounted for, in addition to individual interests, that for a society, or any group, to function properly, the collective and individual interests must be weighed and considered. And, we point out that the normie right has swallowed self destructive individualism too far, and completely abandoned the collective interests of their own (i.e. White people), which has caused nothing but problems.
They're not truly pure collectivists. They are slaves to individualist masters. For example, a pure collectivist would take the blame for bad parts of his collective, and pride himself in the good parts of his collective.
Outside of exclusively the US military, I've never seen this once. No collectivist is ever prepared to take accountability for their collective. That is because their collectivism is a fraud to make gullible people grant them money and power. This is also why the masters can just change the narrative on a dime and use the Useful Idiots as thugish enforcers. It's all a fraud to enrich the leadership, and policy changes are done simply to solidify the leadership's control. There's no actual representation by any collectivist group. In fact, representation in a true collective is nonsense. The collective doesn't represent you. You represent it.
“You want white people to be safe and prosperous, and these insane murders are helping you accomplish your goals in a roundabout way, therefore you want more white people to be killed by blacks, and that makes you the real anti-white person.”
This is literally how your ideological capture works. Dead whites are good, and you're happy to watch them die because you think it "accelerates" what you claim is inevitable (and is not). It's the definition of accelerationism.
In the words of Four Lions: "Bomb the mosques, radicalize the moderates"
I don’t enjoy seeing anyone killed unless they very obviously deserve it. I certainly don’t enjoy seeing my own racial/ethnic in-group suffering disproportionate interracial violence at the hands of people who clearly hate us. If I could snap my fingers and undo this murder, I’d do it in a heartbeat.
So what exactly is your assertion here? That I’m lying when I say I don’t want these murders? That innocent whites dying at the hands of black criminals makes me happy because such deaths might trigger an appropriate response in the form of increased ethnic/racial solidarity among white peoples? Am I supposed to advocate for my in-group to shed their doormat behavior while also completely ignoring these dead white kids? Because by your logic, if I suggest that these murders and the subsequent behavior of non-whites are evidence for the necessity of greater collective action, then I am automatically excited about dead white kids.
Honestly, you might be mentally ill. I don’t think all your wires are connected. If I’ve understood correctly, you’re essentially positing that I’m a communist who is using white identity politics as cover, and that I actually pray for feral blacks to murder more innocent white kids because that will help me achieve my true goal, which is - again - communism. And when my masters (???) and I succeed in our mission, I will immediately stab whitey in the back (even though everything I say is explicitly in favor of rediscovering white identity and solidarity so that we can defend ourselves and continue to exist).
What is wrong with you? I can’t imagine that no one in your real life has failed to recognize how bizarrely incoherent you are. Do you just repeat the word “Fabian” until they go away?
I don’t enjoy seeing anyone killed unless they very obviously deserve it.
Yeah, but this is everyone to you. This is always everyone to you. This is other white people you will label as race traitors, or just declare to be jews.
Yes, you're lying when you say you don't want these murders because you believe in accelerating your ideology more.
Yes, you're a race-communist, that's National Socialism is.
It's what you're doing. My issue is that segregation is not needed.
Why are you intentionally supporting violence against whites again? Oh right, kill as many whites as you want so you can argue some political abstraction is better.
You don't have an objection to this murder, you support it.
Dumb word salad nigger. Either make sense or STFU
Maybe I'm not enough of a profile stalker to be aware of a greater context, but as far as I can see for this thread, the only thing u/EBernays has said looks absolutely nothing like what you've accused him of in this unhinged post.
The alt-right are collectivists, I won't treat them as individuals. They rejected that.
“Get in here or you’re going to get hit with a spear!”
“Pfft, I’m not going to be a collectivist loser.”
<gets hit with spear>
The funniest part is that you are so gung ho about your immediate friends and family being strapped and ready to roll, but you can’t wrap your head around a community or a nation wanting that same security and solidarity. You’re still collectivist. You’ve just drawn the line at your own preference.
You are never someone who would invite anyone in without stabbing them in the back first. Being your ally is no different than being your enemy, except people have a better chance at survival fighting you then helping you.
My friends and family are fine to fight you as well. You would never protect us. You would stab us in the chest, claim that someone else did it, ask for money, then stab us in the back, and then call us race traitors for [insert latest political excuse to monopolize power here]. Same shit different day. Just as with any communist, it is always better to be dead than red, because being red means you get to die more slowly and you're guaranteed to lose.
You do not now, never have, and never will represent the interests of any group but your masters and their objectives. You are not a friend to white people. You are not a white ally. You do not represent whites. You are simply a Leftist and never anything else. The rest of us have families and friends.
That's called individualism, faggot. I get to draw the line at who I choose to affiliate with, and it ain't ever you.
There's this thing called reality, where opposing ideas can meet and cause nuance, where more than two things can be true at the same time, and alter sound judgments beyond the false dichotomies that you, the left, and the normie right like to claim.
Reality meets in the middle, between self destructive individualism and self destructive collectivism. The non-normie right aren't pure collectivists. We just acknowledge that collective interests do indeed exist, and must be acknowledged and accounted for, in addition to individual interests, that for a society, or any group, to function properly, the collective and individual interests must be weighed and considered. And, we point out that the normie right has swallowed self destructive individualism too far, and completely abandoned the collective interests of their own (i.e. White people), which has caused nothing but problems.
They're not truly pure collectivists. They are slaves to individualist masters. For example, a pure collectivist would take the blame for bad parts of his collective, and pride himself in the good parts of his collective.
Outside of exclusively the US military, I've never seen this once. No collectivist is ever prepared to take accountability for their collective. That is because their collectivism is a fraud to make gullible people grant them money and power. This is also why the masters can just change the narrative on a dime and use the Useful Idiots as thugish enforcers. It's all a fraud to enrich the leadership, and policy changes are done simply to solidify the leadership's control. There's no actual representation by any collectivist group. In fact, representation in a true collective is nonsense. The collective doesn't represent you. You represent it.
“You want white people to be safe and prosperous, and these insane murders are helping you accomplish your goals in a roundabout way, therefore you want more white people to be killed by blacks, and that makes you the real anti-white person.”
This is extra retarded even for you.
This is literally how your ideological capture works. Dead whites are good, and you're happy to watch them die because you think it "accelerates" what you claim is inevitable (and is not). It's the definition of accelerationism.
In the words of Four Lions: "Bomb the mosques, radicalize the moderates"
I don’t enjoy seeing anyone killed unless they very obviously deserve it. I certainly don’t enjoy seeing my own racial/ethnic in-group suffering disproportionate interracial violence at the hands of people who clearly hate us. If I could snap my fingers and undo this murder, I’d do it in a heartbeat.
So what exactly is your assertion here? That I’m lying when I say I don’t want these murders? That innocent whites dying at the hands of black criminals makes me happy because such deaths might trigger an appropriate response in the form of increased ethnic/racial solidarity among white peoples? Am I supposed to advocate for my in-group to shed their doormat behavior while also completely ignoring these dead white kids? Because by your logic, if I suggest that these murders and the subsequent behavior of non-whites are evidence for the necessity of greater collective action, then I am automatically excited about dead white kids.
Honestly, you might be mentally ill. I don’t think all your wires are connected. If I’ve understood correctly, you’re essentially positing that I’m a communist who is using white identity politics as cover, and that I actually pray for feral blacks to murder more innocent white kids because that will help me achieve my true goal, which is - again - communism. And when my masters (???) and I succeed in our mission, I will immediately stab whitey in the back (even though everything I say is explicitly in favor of rediscovering white identity and solidarity so that we can defend ourselves and continue to exist).
What is wrong with you? I can’t imagine that no one in your real life has failed to recognize how bizarrely incoherent you are. Do you just repeat the word “Fabian” until they go away?
Yeah, but this is everyone to you. This is always everyone to you. This is other white people you will label as race traitors, or just declare to be jews.
Yes, you're lying when you say you don't want these murders because you believe in accelerating your ideology more.
Yes, you're a race-communist, that's National Socialism is.