If you are sincerely making the argument comparing a shuriken, designed for throwing, to that of a circular saw blade which is fixed into a frame for purpose then you're just as retarded as the politicians you are whining about who argue any and all property should be confiscated by the government "for your own good".
Have you never been to a hardware store? New blades are sold individually packaged. But that's not even the point, it's that banning things that looked scary in 80s ninja movies was retarded. Doubly retarded now that we can legally carry superior firearms in most places where silly ninja stuff is banned.
If you are sincerely making the argument comparing a shuriken, designed for throwing, to that of a circular saw blade which is fixed into a frame for purpose then you're just as retarded as the politicians you are whining about who argue any and all property should be confiscated by the government "for your own good".
Have you never been to a hardware store? New blades are sold individually packaged. But that's not even the point, it's that banning things that looked scary in 80s ninja movies was retarded. Doubly retarded now that we can legally carry superior firearms in most places where silly ninja stuff is banned.
Come on now. You know the kind of person making this argument has never done any sort of blue collar work.
Autistic retard alert.
Do not underestimate the idiocy of a british politician.
Op: 'Baning this is stupid, besides it's functionally the same as this tool'
You: 'you are as bad as the politicians wanting to confiscate property because of that comparison'
???
Footballs designed for throwing. Should we ban those next?