I honestly can't tell if it's because of corruption, their hatred of the native population, they're too pussy to actually ENFORCE the law of a mix of all three for the current state of the UK.
Since when is the West responsible for what other countries laws are? Are they going to take in the whole population of Pakistan just because the laws aren't what they consider to be "humane"? wait don't answer that , that's exactly what they are doing.
Two world wars destroyed the genetic line of the British fighting man, and left open the opportunity for the physically weak and mentally feeble males to procreate as that was all that were left.
The courts should have contacted Tahir Zahoor Ahmed of Therapy Works to find out that the suggested punishment of '80 lashes' for alcoholics is very rarely used in today's alcohol fuelled endemic within Pakistan.
According the the principles of Qunoon-e-Shahdat (The law of evidence) Zahir Jaffer was given a very fair trial, even after a confession, because Islam will not have an innocent person punished regardless of how the facts may seem stacked against them. He was sentenced to hanging and his accomplices given ten years in prison each. This was after everyone involved in the crime, and reporting upon it, was kept detained within Pakistan until the trial was over.
A very thorough investigation which highlighted alcohol abuse, violence against women and the rule of law. All important issues in today's Pakisan.
Unless the British courts think they are better than that of a former region of the Empire which they helped to liberate into being an Islamic country I think their ruling was wrong. And quite racist.
Perhaps some of that Sir Keir Starmer/BBC grooming gangs debacle was caught up in it all?
At this point, lawyers should only be allowed to take on such cases, if they live in a 100% muslim neighbourhood. The same goes for judges. (And deport is the default decision, without the need of a judge.)
If you live in a nice, affluent, British area, you can fuck right off.
I honestly can't tell if it's because of corruption, their hatred of the native population, they're too pussy to actually ENFORCE the law of a mix of all three for the current state of the UK.
All of the above.
worse
human rights lawyers
It's mostly fear of being labeled islamophobic and a intense hate of the native population, with a healthy dose of liberal mind rot.
Source, a native brit.
How did you end up ruled by people who hate your guts this much? The Normans didn't have it out for the Saxons this bad.
Its excuses to continue the rape and murder of native White Britons
"muh inhumane treatment"
Since when is the West responsible for what other countries laws are? Are they going to take in the whole population of Pakistan just because the laws aren't what they consider to be "humane"? wait don't answer that , that's exactly what they are doing.
The UK's infringement on free speech is inhumane.
Two world wars destroyed the genetic line of the British fighting man, and left open the opportunity for the physically weak and mentally feeble males to procreate as that was all that were left.
They are now doomed to extinction.
This was something I once said, but it isn't actually true: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties
Guess they were just faggots all along.
Never forget that Hitler never wanted to fight the British and that the drunken traitor refused numerous peace offers.
British people and by extension the Boers are getting what they paid for.
They decided to be guard dogs for z0g.
Now z0g is deciding to put it's old dogs down.
brb converting to Islam for state mandated loli gf
The government is telling people how to get them deported. The public must treat them worse than they would be in their home country.
The courts should have contacted Tahir Zahoor Ahmed of Therapy Works to find out that the suggested punishment of '80 lashes' for alcoholics is very rarely used in today's alcohol fuelled endemic within Pakistan.
He has spoken out on international incidences before when Zahir Jaffer murdered Noor Mukadam (The daughter of a diplomate to South Korea and Ireland) by by beheading her whilst intoxicated with alcohol, that is, of course after confining her and raping her.
According the the principles of Qunoon-e-Shahdat (The law of evidence) Zahir Jaffer was given a very fair trial, even after a confession, because Islam will not have an innocent person punished regardless of how the facts may seem stacked against them. He was sentenced to hanging and his accomplices given ten years in prison each. This was after everyone involved in the crime, and reporting upon it, was kept detained within Pakistan until the trial was over.
A very thorough investigation which highlighted alcohol abuse, violence against women and the rule of law. All important issues in today's Pakisan.
Unless the British courts think they are better than that of a former region of the Empire which they helped to liberate into being an Islamic country I think their ruling was wrong. And quite racist.
Perhaps some of that Sir Keir Starmer/BBC grooming gangs debacle was caught up in it all?
At this point, lawyers should only be allowed to take on such cases, if they live in a 100% muslim neighbourhood. The same goes for judges. (And deport is the default decision, without the need of a judge.)
If you live in a nice, affluent, British area, you can fuck right off.
Do they give the guy alcohol in British jail?
Why is UK ghae?