I find it curious that they mistakenly add a journalist to the group and it happens to be one from The Atlantic. It's probably just a coincidence but I can't help but wonder if this was a setup somehow.
The Atlantic article asks security lawyers about SCIFs and whether in general talking about Top Secret info in Signal would be a crime because author wants to make a scandal out of a minor mistake.
"Normally, cellphones are not permitted inside a SCIF". None of the information alluded to would need to be in a SCIF.
Author purposely didn't show them the actual chat because it's at most Secret and they'd say it maybe warranted a reprimand.
He's been rewarded by being made the EIC of The Atlantic.
"Oops, wrong Berg got texted"
There's so many, it's hard to keep them straight.
I find it curious that they mistakenly add a journalist to the group and it happens to be one from The Atlantic. It's probably just a coincidence but I can't help but wonder if this was a setup somehow.
I don't think he's making it up, but...
The Atlantic article asks security lawyers about SCIFs and whether in general talking about Top Secret info in Signal would be a crime because author wants to make a scandal out of a minor mistake.
"Normally, cellphones are not permitted inside a SCIF". None of the information alluded to would need to be in a SCIF.
Author purposely didn't show them the actual chat because it's at most Secret and they'd say it maybe warranted a reprimand.