You are right that Judaism is going to obliterate the establishment right, but it won't even obliterate the MAGA right. MAGA is the people and their mass convictions, not the handful of influencers trying to keep reins on the movement. All leading indicators show they're trending away from Zionism and foreign intervention.
For example, Candace Owens put her career out to die on the hill of anti-Zionism, and she's more alive than ever. Her former employer Ben Shapiro is the one that's shriveling away in the podcast wilderness.
Joe Rogan just hosted Ian Carroll, the guy who's famous for ratioing Elon Musk with a 2000 word tweet about subversive Jewish influence, and then Daryl Cooper, the guy who's most famous for revisionist WWII history. Anyone think that's an accident?
A lot of people look at current viewership and influence when they should be looking at trends. The trends are all against Israel. Yes, the establishment is conducting a full court press to quash this, but that's obviously doomed. Has anyone in human history succeeding in putting the cat back in the bag?
It remains to be seen whether there's any viability to MAGA beyond Trump.
Outside of some mild pushback on Operation Warpspeed and the H1B visa endorsement (with Vivek and to a lesser degree Elon as scapegoats but with Trump’s full support), MAGA for the most part just mindlessly cheer whatever Trump supports whether its America First or not.
It's not really clear what happens to the cult of personality when Trump goes bye bye in 3 years.
So far there is no heir.
JD Vance can be polished. But he's already compromised by his CIA backers. And he's not even respected by his base as evidenced by the recent meme faceswapping campaign mocking him.
evidenced by the recent meme faceswapping campaign mocking him.
I think being able to meme about a guy and have him laugh along with you doing it is a sign of not just viability but also potential as a candidate in the future. Its one of the things that made Obama so beloved by the Left.
The Left wants to convince everyone that this meme is some big "everyone hates Vance" movement, but its been obvious since the outset that its clearly just people having a laugh with some extreme photoshop and has little malice to it.
I mean, most of them are so warped and distorted that I don't think it even remotely resembles his actual face anymore to make any judgement calls.
Like most organic memes, somebody had an unhinged idea that was really funny, and now everyone builds on it and pushes it further until it barely is in touch with reality. And then everyone wants to be in on the fun times and so they all make one until its everywhere.
There is some amount of psychology behind humor and what people laugh at, but I think the Left has shown many times that deep dive psychoanalysis on memes is also a losing action because of how rarely its truly reflecting reality.
Between alllllll these accounts they have >MILLIONS< of posts, and I can count the number of times they've even mentioned the single most influential lobbying group on one hand.
And Carlson may not tweet "AIPAC" much, but he is the guy that platformed Massie saying every congressperson has an AIPAC handler. In fact, that's the very interview you're dismissing. "It's just a timecode," but of course it's the timecode for AIPAC being explicitly called out as a powerful foreign interest lobby group whose interests do not align with America's. Kind of a lot to brush off.
I agree that some of these people are very imperfect, and I would even say a few of these people are downright useless. But I think your reducing the "are they good" check to a single search term that isn't even exhaustive for the one issue you're looking at is kind of retarded.
As for your last question, the only times I can think of is when the jews in power genocided the people they were ruling over. It's usually also combined with antisemitism laws and mass incarcerations of the people, or on the flip side, going full hedonistic libertarian paradise, to dull the populace with vice and sin, bread and circuses. Neither "solution" lasted very long, though.
You are right that Judaism is going to obliterate the establishment right, but it won't even obliterate the MAGA right. MAGA is the people and their mass convictions, not the handful of influencers trying to keep reins on the movement. All leading indicators show they're trending away from Zionism and foreign intervention.
For example, Candace Owens put her career out to die on the hill of anti-Zionism, and she's more alive than ever. Her former employer Ben Shapiro is the one that's shriveling away in the podcast wilderness.
Joe Rogan just hosted Ian Carroll, the guy who's famous for ratioing Elon Musk with a 2000 word tweet about subversive Jewish influence, and then Daryl Cooper, the guy who's most famous for revisionist WWII history. Anyone think that's an accident?
A lot of people look at current viewership and influence when they should be looking at trends. The trends are all against Israel. Yes, the establishment is conducting a full court press to quash this, but that's obviously doomed. Has anyone in human history succeeding in putting the cat back in the bag?
the same maga who is rallying behind the absolute cuckold that is trump who pulled a chair for netanyahu?
the same candace owens who is a black woman racemixer?
the same joe rogan that has 70% of his political guests be jews?
I don't really hold it against blacks for racemixing. I would do the same if my option was dating a black person....
Correct. But it brings down the other race. Zero sum game.
It remains to be seen whether there's any viability to MAGA beyond Trump.
Outside of some mild pushback on Operation Warpspeed and the H1B visa endorsement (with Vivek and to a lesser degree Elon as scapegoats but with Trump’s full support), MAGA for the most part just mindlessly cheer whatever Trump supports whether its America First or not.
It's not really clear what happens to the cult of personality when Trump goes bye bye in 3 years.
So far there is no heir.
JD Vance can be polished. But he's already compromised by his CIA backers. And he's not even respected by his base as evidenced by the recent meme faceswapping campaign mocking him.
I think being able to meme about a guy and have him laugh along with you doing it is a sign of not just viability but also potential as a candidate in the future. Its one of the things that made Obama so beloved by the Left.
The Left wants to convince everyone that this meme is some big "everyone hates Vance" movement, but its been obvious since the outset that its clearly just people having a laugh with some extreme photoshop and has little malice to it.
I don't think the recent Vance faceswapping memes mean that MAGA hates Vance.
But the content of the memes say something about his physiognomy and the fact that even his supporters don't fully respect him.
In general, Trump memes from the right are epic. They portray him as a badass, like a Chad, like a statesman, like a Caesar, like a hero.
I'm not sure what the entire deeper psychology behind the Vance memes are, but it mostly signals that he is seen even by his fans as a dumpy fat kid.
I mean, most of them are so warped and distorted that I don't think it even remotely resembles his actual face anymore to make any judgement calls.
Like most organic memes, somebody had an unhinged idea that was really funny, and now everyone builds on it and pushes it further until it barely is in touch with reality. And then everyone wants to be in on the fun times and so they all make one until its everywhere.
There is some amount of psychology behind humor and what people laugh at, but I think the Left has shown many times that deep dive psychoanalysis on memes is also a losing action because of how rarely its truly reflecting reality.
95% of the front page X posts on T_D all come from the same six fags, and all you have to do is search their name for AIPAC.
Here, I already did it for you in another post:
DC Draino: https://nitter.poast.org/search?f=tweets&q=from%3Adc_draino+aipac&since=&until=&near=
Jack Posobiec: https://nitter.poast.org/search?f=tweets&q=from%3Ajackposobiec+aipac&since=&until=&near=
Wall Street Apes: https://nitter.poast.org/search?f=tweets&q=from%3Awallstreetapes+aipac&since=&until=&near=
Steven Crowder: https://nitter.poast.org/search?f=tweets&q=from%3Ascrowder+aipac&since=&until=&near=
Patrick Bet-David: https://nitter.poast.org/search?f=users&q=from%3Apatrickbetdavid+aipac
Only once from Tucker Carlson, and it was just a timecode in an interview: https://nitter.poast.org/search?f=tweets&q=from%3Atuckercarlson+aipac
Catturd only twice, 6 years ago, but mentioned in passing: https://nitter.poast.org/search?f=tweets&q=from%3Acatturd2+aipac&since=&until=&near=
LOTT (((unsurprising))): https://xcancel.com/search?f=tweets&q=from%3Alibsoftiktok+aipac&since=&until=&near=
Emerald Robinson: https://xcancel.com/search?f=tweets&q=from%3Aemeraldrobinson+aipac&since=&until=&near=
Amuse only once, and it sounds like he's crying that they didn't give more to Republicans: https://nitter.poast.org/search?f=tweets&q=from%3Aamuse+aipac&since=&until=&near=
Between alllllll these accounts they have >MILLIONS< of posts, and I can count the number of times they've even mentioned the single most influential lobbying group on one hand.
Well, to be fair to Emerald Robinson....
And Carlson may not tweet "AIPAC" much, but he is the guy that platformed Massie saying every congressperson has an AIPAC handler. In fact, that's the very interview you're dismissing. "It's just a timecode," but of course it's the timecode for AIPAC being explicitly called out as a powerful foreign interest lobby group whose interests do not align with America's. Kind of a lot to brush off.
I agree that some of these people are very imperfect, and I would even say a few of these people are downright useless. But I think your reducing the "are they good" check to a single search term that isn't even exhaustive for the one issue you're looking at is kind of retarded.
As for your last question, the only times I can think of is when the jews in power genocided the people they were ruling over. It's usually also combined with antisemitism laws and mass incarcerations of the people, or on the flip side, going full hedonistic libertarian paradise, to dull the populace with vice and sin, bread and circuses. Neither "solution" lasted very long, though.