'Being gay' is punishable by death, but wait, that law only applies for those abusing kids. Huh, sort of like that Trayvon Martin was killed for 'wearing a hoodie'.
An informal survey of 127 nonprofits dealing with LGBTQ issues and other at risk groups...showed that 97 percent of them had lost almost all their budgets as a result of the USAID cuts.
I thought USAID was doing life-saving work, not spreading life-threatening practices everywhere.
There needs to be a conversation about the fact that the only reason why the average life expectancy of sexual degenerates is more then 50 is due to a massive investment by the rest of society into medicines that otherwise wouldn't be needed. This applies to "the straights" as well, but we know where the novel diseases brew. It should concern everybody that the current attitude in the gay community is "HIV isn't that big of a deal, just take your PrEP."
We probably are spreading AIDs in Africa for human experimentation. USAID will not reduce human immiseration. However, cutting USAID funding absolutely will.
The law also allows for the death penalty for anyone convicted of “aggravated homosexuality,” a sweeping term defined as acts of same-sex relations with minors or disabled people.
Only one sentence mentions children out of many AoV.
This thread title is not representative of the article's message.
Don't get me wrong it's a bunch of people stealing US money under false pretences and there's all sorts of bad things connected to it. But the thread title is focused on something not apparent in the article.
defined as acts of same-sex relations with minors or disabled people
Doesn't sound "sweeping" unless you're a NAMBLA member. But that's the rub, a sweeping majority of homosexuals report that their first experience was as a minor with an older person. Thread title is extracting the truth out of the article's content; headlines are bullshit.
If inference is the game then the other side are well versed in it.
Being nimble on facts and proving transgenderism and children are not good choices to put together. Homosexuals being brazenly "Gay" around children are red flags waiting to happen (Which we all know from history!) and USAID money never went to grassroots communities but instead funded sex and drug trafficking rings - that's where we win with documented facts (Or suspicious missing records showing corruption and/or inconstancy).
Plenty of same-sex attracted people exist and are not child molesters. plenty of heterosexual people and are child molesters.
It's never a case of "All" in either camp and the NYT didn't make that claim as inferred by this thread's title.
AoV has always been up to scratch on facts over feelings and this is an example of that not being the case.
“Using random-probability studies reported by three different sets of investigators, an estimate that about 4 percent of the general population is bisexual-to-homosexual was employed to generate relative degrees of 'dangerousness' of the various sexual orientations. It appears that at least a third of all the reported child molestations involve homosexual acts, while girls account for about two-thirds of children victimized. Those who practice homosexual acts are at least 12 times more apt to molest a child sexually, and with suitable corrections for bisexuals (who molest both genders), probably at least 16 times more apt to molest a child.”
Bottom line, molestation is a serious problem in the gay community, one that shouldn’t ever be understated.
Only one sentence mentions children out of many AoV.
Not really material. The article's header says that "being gay" gets you the death penalty, when the article... in one sentence... points out that no, this is just for child molesters.
This thread title is not representative of the article's message.
The article title isn't. But one wonders why it was left to you and me to make that observation, rather than the people working there. Could it be that they wanted to smear Uganda?
But the thread title is focused on something not apparent in the article.
The article title isn't. But one wonders why it was left to you and me to make that observation, rather than the people working there. Could it be that they wanted to smear Uganda?
These are question which indeed should be pondered.
I'll be blunt and honest, pride parades AREN'T helping debunk this...
'Being gay' is punishable by death, but wait, that law only applies for those abusing kids. Huh, sort of like that Trayvon Martin was killed for 'wearing a hoodie'.
I thought USAID was doing life-saving work, not spreading life-threatening practices everywhere.
There needs to be a conversation about the fact that the only reason why the average life expectancy of sexual degenerates is more then 50 is due to a massive investment by the rest of society into medicines that otherwise wouldn't be needed. This applies to "the straights" as well, but we know where the novel diseases brew. It should concern everybody that the current attitude in the gay community is "HIV isn't that big of a deal, just take your PrEP."
We probably are spreading AIDs in Africa for human experimentation. USAID will not reduce human immiseration. However, cutting USAID funding absolutely will.
Facts.
Where's the lie
Only one sentence mentions children out of many AoV.
This thread title is not representative of the article's message.
Don't get me wrong it's a bunch of people stealing US money under false pretences and there's all sorts of bad things connected to it. But the thread title is focused on something not apparent in the article.
Doesn't sound "sweeping" unless you're a NAMBLA member. But that's the rub, a sweeping majority of homosexuals report that their first experience was as a minor with an older person. Thread title is extracting the truth out of the article's content; headlines are bullshit.
If inference is the game then the other side are well versed in it.
Being nimble on facts and proving transgenderism and children are not good choices to put together. Homosexuals being brazenly "Gay" around children are red flags waiting to happen (Which we all know from history!) and USAID money never went to grassroots communities but instead funded sex and drug trafficking rings - that's where we win with documented facts (Or suspicious missing records showing corruption and/or inconstancy).
Plenty of same-sex attracted people exist and are not child molesters. plenty of heterosexual people and are child molesters.
It's never a case of "All" in either camp and the NYT didn't make that claim as inferred by this thread's title.
AoV has always been up to scratch on facts over feelings and this is an example of that not being the case.
"Plenty" is a fuggin low standard.
“Using random-probability studies reported by three different sets of investigators, an estimate that about 4 percent of the general population is bisexual-to-homosexual was employed to generate relative degrees of 'dangerousness' of the various sexual orientations. It appears that at least a third of all the reported child molestations involve homosexual acts, while girls account for about two-thirds of children victimized. Those who practice homosexual acts are at least 12 times more apt to molest a child sexually, and with suitable corrections for bisexuals (who molest both genders), probably at least 16 times more apt to molest a child.”
Bottom line, molestation is a serious problem in the gay community, one that shouldn’t ever be understated.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2466/pr0.1985.57.3f.1227
That's the rabbit hole which led to here. But by all means, I'm all for liberty and what that can cost people.
Not really material. The article's header says that "being gay" gets you the death penalty, when the article... in one sentence... points out that no, this is just for child molesters.
The article title isn't. But one wonders why it was left to you and me to make that observation, rather than the people working there. Could it be that they wanted to smear Uganda?
I'm very confused. It's very apparent.
These are question which indeed should be pondered.