Only one sentence mentions children out of many AoV.
Not really material. The article's header says that "being gay" gets you the death penalty, when the article... in one sentence... points out that no, this is just for child molesters.
This thread title is not representative of the article's message.
The article title isn't. But one wonders why it was left to you and me to make that observation, rather than the people working there. Could it be that they wanted to smear Uganda?
But the thread title is focused on something not apparent in the article.
The article title isn't. But one wonders why it was left to you and me to make that observation, rather than the people working there. Could it be that they wanted to smear Uganda?
These are question which indeed should be pondered.
Not really material. The article's header says that "being gay" gets you the death penalty, when the article... in one sentence... points out that no, this is just for child molesters.
The article title isn't. But one wonders why it was left to you and me to make that observation, rather than the people working there. Could it be that they wanted to smear Uganda?
I'm very confused. It's very apparent.
These are question which indeed should be pondered.