Atlantic: When You’re MAGA, They Let You Do It
(archive.ph)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
This is giving into the assumption that this is true, and not them fabricating an angle whole cloth.
I used to volunteer with teenage boys, and still do on occasion. Few of them know or care about Tate, they have much more normal role models like sports people or fucking Trump himself. The ones who do are trying to be edgy, not sincere.
Tate's entire "popularity" is by worthless 20-30 something wiggers and other ghetto bred losers who think gold chains are signs of success, as well as people hyping him up as this great evil (which brings out the contrarian defense force).
Tate is entirely "kids eating tide pods because colors" all over again. The media thinking this must be the case, and then creating a whole new reality where it becomes the case because they said it was.
Tate is basically a 90s-2000s era rapper who podcasts instead of making shitty music.
That is such a perfect distillation of the man.
Doesn't he make shitty music though?
Does he really? I don't pay much attention to him.
I vaguely have memories of him in a rap video. I could be wrong, I did phrase it as a question
this feels like psyop from the left, they intentionally brought him into the spotlight so they can point him as the right wing misogynist boogieman, nobody even heard of him until the media endlessly reeeed about him
The thing is, we have the paper trail of him becoming an ultra rich loser and how that panned out. He probably did in fact have a small following then too, relative to his power.
But they absolutely blew him up to the size they say he is now to build a narrative.