Search your feelings pedes, you know it to be true...
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (63)
sorted by:
Both of them were older men at that point. That could be as simple as a Leonardo DiCaprio situation as "likes young hot things (legal)." It could easily mean otherwise, absolutely, but its not hard confirmation either.
Again, nothing regarding those two is concrete enough to escape "two rich men being rich near each other." There is plenty of space for that to exist, but nothing we have on hand.
Uh huh. Sure.
We're talking about Epstein, someone that abducted, trafficked, raped, tortured, and murdered children, and helped other people do the same.
We're not talking about the average guy who prefers younger women, but actual women, not kids.
Yeah, and many of those men there usually had arm candy at that were barely legal. Its not hard to mistake a 14 year old for an 18 year old under 40 lbs of makeup and them not talking, as would be the case at these ridiculous parties.
We know what Epstein did, its pretty well documented how bad it is from what little we have already.
The point I am making is that Trump's statement has enough plausible deniability that he wasn't 100% confirmed knew Epstein was involved with actual minors as "likes em young" was pretty common at the time among the elite of anything from pedos to just "barely legal" ones. It was common enough that Oingo Boingo made a chart topping song mocking the problem in the 80s.
We're not talking about barely legal girls. We're talking about kids, children, and even babies.
Do you apply this same excuse to everyone who knew about the casting couches and predatory hiring producers in Hollywood, like Harvey Weinstein? Everyone in Hollywood knew what he was doing, and let it happen. Many even made jokes about it on TV and on award ceremony shows. It was an open secret in Hollywood. Why do you excuse Trump, and the "friends" he kept, the open secret of the vile evils they committed, while (I assume) you condemn Hollywood for the same thing?
I am. He said the word "young" which could mean either or in these cases because there is a long history of both with that kind of degenerate elite.
You seem to be too used to using Leftie tactics of "say scary words to instantly win" to parse the point I am making. So I'll reiterate and see if you can this time.
Trump noted Epstein's desire for young girls. He said it vaguely enough that it isn't hard confirmed he knew it was literally underaged women instead of just young trophy models. You know, the thing that many rich guys across the world do pretty openly, picking up dumb, arm candy that are barely of age but still are, legally.
This is given extra weight given that Trump was one of the few people to actually even work against Epstein later, even if it wasn't a whole lot. Its a small amount of smoke in both directions that means the wind could blow in either direction without surprise.
Adult women are allowed to be retarded and suffer the consequences of being "free." That includes the right to be preyed on to make more money than most of us combined ever will. I literally do not care about them.
You know, the same way that despite my point saying "rich powerful men are abusing their power to use legal but young women as objects" you have zero objection to that. You in fact care so little you just brush it aside to talk about something else.
Try not to point a hypocrite argument if your example literally makes you look like one. Again, not helping that "used to using Leftie tactics" position.
I didn't. I said multiple times to other comments that he goes in the chipper too if its confirmed. You brought in weak ass evidence as if it was gospel and thought you could say "RAPING BABIES RAPING BABIES" and just win by leveraging emotion.